US · guidance
CMS SOM App. L, Tag Q-0083
§416.43(d) Standard: Performance Improvement Projects
(1) The number and scope of distinct improvement projects conducted annually
must reflect the scope and complexity of the ASC’s services and operations.
(2) The ASC must document the projects that are being conducted. The
documentation, at a minimum, must include the reason(s) for implementing
the project, and a description of the project’s results.
Interpretive Guidelines: §416.43(d)
Every ASC must undertake one or more specific quality improvement projects each year.
Larger ASCs with multiple ORs or procedure rooms, multiple types of surgical
procedures offered, or high volume of cases are expected to undertake more or more
complex projects. Furthermore, a highly complex improvement project might be of such
scope that it could reasonably be the only project an ASC undertakes in a given year.
CMS does not specify particular projects that each ASC must undertake, but instead
expects the projects to be based on the types of services the ASC furnishes, as well as
other aspects of the ASC’s operations. The requirement for annual projects does not
mean that an ASC may not undertake a complex project that is expected to require more
than 1 year in order to be completed.
The ASC must keep records on its performance improvement projects. Each project
must, at a minimum, include an explanation of why the project was undertaken. The
explanation must indicate what data collected in the ASC or based on recommendations
of nationally recognized organizations leads the ASC to believe that the project’s
activities will actually result in improvements in patient health outcomes and safety in the
ASC. For projects that are still underway, the ASC must be able to explain what
activities the project entails, and how the impact of the project is being monitored.
Unless the project has just begun, the ASC must be able to provide evidence that it is
collecting data that will enable it to assess the project’s effectiveness. For projects that
are completed, the ASC must be able to show documentation that explains what the
results of the project were, and what actions, if any, the ASC took in response to those
results.
Survey Procedures: §416.43(d)
• Ask the ASC to show you documentation for performance improvement projects
currently underway, as well as those completed in the prior year.
• If a large, complex, or high volume ASC has only one project underway, is the
scope of that project such that it is likely to have a significant impact on the
ASC’s quality of care or patient safety?
• Does the ASC’s documentation indicate the rationale for undertaking each
project? Does the ASC have data indicating it had a problem in the area targeted
for improvement, or could the ASC point to recommendations from a nationally
recognized expert organization suggesting the activities?
• Does the documentation for the completed project(s) include the project’s results?
If a project was unsuccessful, ask the ASC what actions it took as a result of that
information. If the project was successful, ask the ASC how it is sustaining the
improvement.
History
Rev.56, Issued: 12-30-09, Effective/Implementation: 12-30-09
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
60eabaddbe1050b9f2cbfdceee93c42ea9f576ffa05f041a65d373f2656b146a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.