US · guidance
CMS SOM App. J, Tag W330
§483.460(b)(2) If appropriate, physicians must participate in the review and update of an
individual program plan as part of the interdisciplinary team process either in person or
through written report to the interdisciplinary team.
Guidance §483.460(b)(2)
The need for physician participation on an individual client’s IPP team is determined by the
medical needs of the client. How the physician participates (whether through written report,
telephone consultation, attendance at the meeting, etc.) is to be left to the discretion of the
facility. In instances where a client has no overriding medical issues, the nurse of the facility can
represent the medical component on the IDT process or consult with the appropriate physician
and share the information with the team. However, in situations where a client’s medical
condition is unstable/fragile to the extent that it impacts the training/work that may be planned,
the physician must participate in providing guidance on the types and extent of programs that
would be appropriate considering the client’s physical/medical limitations.
If a client is noted to be having difficulty participating in the objectives set forth in his/her IPP
due to serious medical concerns, review the input that was provided by the physician into the
development of the plan and whether the IPP team requested such input.
(c) Standard: Nursing services
History
Rev. 135, Issued: 02-27-15, Effective: 04-27-15, Implementation: 04-27-15
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
91d9b7ec4f4e88b28abb5a7241c33aa2c3161dc098a2ab925c7e56e303eae69e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.