US · guidance
CMS SOM App. J, Tag W247
§483.440(c)(6)(vi) Include opportunities for client choice and self-management
Guidance §483.440(c)(6)(vi)
Choice and self-management are integral components of becoming independent. Clients should
be given opportunities for choice and self-management in both formal and informal settings
through the IPP process, leisure activities, and other life choices.
The ICF/IID must incorporate opportunities into daily life experiences that promote choice
making and decision making by clients. Examples of some activities leading toward
responsibility for one's own self-management include, but are not limited to:
1) choosing housing or roommates;
2) choosing clothing to purchase or wear;
3) choosing what, where, and how to eat (e.g., the use of family style dining, access to
condiments and second helpings).
Choices can be made by all clients. The type of choices the person makes may vary from simple
to complex, dependent upon client abilities.
Clients are provided opportunities for choice and self-management and the facility does not
limit choices by making decisions for the people being served without their input. Clients are
provided the opportunity to demonstrate skills to the degree they are capable and only assisted
by staff as indicated in their IPP. A lack of facility staffing or staff convenience must not result in
a limitation of choices of self-management for the clients.
History
Rev. 135, Issued: 02-27-15, Effective: 04-27-15, Implementation: 04-27-15
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
c50ecb435a41ac7420dc4db5e38df9732a880ca38878bb0d0efa3597eb4f9307
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.