Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS SOM App. J, Tag W237

§483.440(c)(5)(iv) The type of data and frequency of data collection necessary to be able to

activein force · 2026-07-22 – presentas-observed

assess progress toward the desired objectives;

Guidance §483.440(c)(5)(iv)

The IDT must determine the type of data necessary to judge a client's progress on an objective,

and describe the data collection method in the written training program. The facility

determines what data to collect, but whatever system is chosen for collection must yield

accurate measurement of the criteria stated in the client's IPP objectives. For example, if the

criteria in the client's IPP objective specified a behavior to be measured by "accuracy," or

"successes out of opportunities," then it would not be acceptable for the prescribed data

collection method to record "level of prompt”.

Examples of a few data collection systems include, but are not limited to:

• level of prompt;

• successful trials completed out of opportunities given;

• frequency counts; and

• frequency sampling.

The IDT must consider and select the type and frequency of data collection for each objective

based upon the need to measure appropriately the client's performance toward the targeted

IPP skill development. The facility should collect data with enough frequency and content to be

able to appropriately measure the client’s performance toward the targeted IPP skill

development. The frequency of data collection may vary with the objective but must be made

at sufficient intervals to allow analysis of the progress of the client.

History

Rev. 135, Issued: 02-27-15, Effective: 04-27-15, Implementation: 04-27-15

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-07-22
Edition
som-2026-07-22
Content hash
1e7e65215fed16dc9ada8392956c308fe10cc2189488034d25374eb2209d5cd3
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.