US · guidance
CMS SOM App. J, Tag W237
§483.440(c)(5)(iv) The type of data and frequency of data collection necessary to be able to
assess progress toward the desired objectives;
Guidance §483.440(c)(5)(iv)
The IDT must determine the type of data necessary to judge a client's progress on an objective,
and describe the data collection method in the written training program. The facility
determines what data to collect, but whatever system is chosen for collection must yield
accurate measurement of the criteria stated in the client's IPP objectives. For example, if the
criteria in the client's IPP objective specified a behavior to be measured by "accuracy," or
"successes out of opportunities," then it would not be acceptable for the prescribed data
collection method to record "level of prompt”.
Examples of a few data collection systems include, but are not limited to:
• level of prompt;
• successful trials completed out of opportunities given;
• frequency counts; and
• frequency sampling.
The IDT must consider and select the type and frequency of data collection for each objective
based upon the need to measure appropriately the client's performance toward the targeted
IPP skill development. The facility should collect data with enough frequency and content to be
able to appropriately measure the client’s performance toward the targeted IPP skill
development. The frequency of data collection may vary with the objective but must be made
at sufficient intervals to allow analysis of the progress of the client.
History
Rev. 135, Issued: 02-27-15, Effective: 04-27-15, Implementation: 04-27-15
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
1e7e65215fed16dc9ada8392956c308fe10cc2189488034d25374eb2209d5cd3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.