US · guidance
CMS SOM App. H, Tag V765
§ 494.180(e) Standard: Internal grievance process
The facility’s internal grievance process
must be implemented so that the patient may file an oral or written grievance with the
facility without reprisal or denial of services. The grievance process must include—
(1) A clearly explained procedure for the submission of grievances.
(2) Timeframes for reviewing the grievance.
(3) A description of how the patient or the patient’s designated representative will be
informed of steps taken to resolve the grievance.
Interpretive Guidance § 494.180(e)(1), (2) and (3)
The facility’s policies and procedures must describe all available grievance procedures to the
patient which must include the ability to file an oral or written grievance with the facility. The
Page 288 of 420
facility must inform the patient and/or the patient’s designated representative (also called
“designee”) of its internal grievance process. Refer to the requirement at V465 under the
Condition for patients’ rights.
Each facility must implement a process to ensure that there will be no reprisal or denial of
services for any patient who files an internal grievance and the grievance procedure will be
clearly explained to patients. The existence of grievances should not be viewed negatively, as this
would be an indication that patients understand the internal grievance process and believe that
filing a grievance will not result in reprisal or denial of services. Lack of grievances does not
indicate a lack of an internal grievance process.
The facility’s grievance process should ensure those grievances involving situations or practices
that place patients or staff members in immediate danger (e.g. the patient's grievance brings
attention to hazardous environmental conditions) are prioritized as needing immediate attention
and resolved in a timely manner as to avoid any injury or harm to the patients and staff
members..
The facility’s process must include clearly defined timeframes for a grievance to be
acknowledged, investigated, and addressed. Timeframes should be sufficient to conduct an
investigation yet ensure that the grievance is addressed in a timely manner.
The patient/designee should be informed of the status of the investigation periodically, and when
resolution is attained or considered attained by the facility. Each grievance should demonstrate
a completed cycle of reviewing the grievance and reporting back to the patient.
History
Rev.
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
634767f6fe2d85d0448942aeab7287212a466ee8f11597782271238778aa410d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.