Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS SOM App. H, Tag V629

§ 494.110 (a)(2) – The program must include, but not be limited to, the following: (i)

activein force · 2026-07-22 – presentas-observed

Adequacy of dialysis.

Interpretive Guidance § 494.110(a)(2)(i):

The intent of QAPI in addressing adequacy of dialysis is to maximize the number of patients who

achieve the goals for adequate dialysis, which include both successful fluid volume management

and clearance of toxins.

To identify opportunities for improvement and track progress in adequacy of dialysis for its

hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis population, the IDT should:

• Review aggregate patient data;

• Identify any commonalities among patients who do not reach the minimum expected

targets;

• Develop a plan to address those causes;

• Implement the plan;

• Monitor the effectiveness of the plan; and

• Adjust portions of the plan that are not successful.

Page 247 of 420

The IDT must use current professionally-accepted clinical practice standards as target values.

Refer to the Measures Assessment Tool (MAT) provided which lists these standards. If a data

report shows that the facility’s ranking for hemodialysis adequacy is below the expected

average, the facility must demonstrate QAPI review of global factors that might affect adequacy,

e.g. missed/shortened treatments, less-efficient dialyzers, and failure to achieve the ordered

blood flow rates.

History

Rev.

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-07-22
Edition
som-2026-07-22
Content hash
a9d5c16514e11a72d4be31dc1a8ccf6df06c77b5affff5bfef95aa0a8dcd1bcd
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.