US · guidance
CMS SOM App. H, Tag V628
§ 494.110 (a)(2) – The dialysis facility must measure, analyze, and track quality indicators
or other aspects of performance that the facility adopts or develops that reflect processes of
care and facility operations. These performance components must influence or relate to the
desired outcomes or be the outcomes themselves. The program must include, but not be
limited to, the following:…
Interpretive Guidance § 494.110 (a)(2):
The facility’s QAPI program monitors the assessment and improvement of care in the facility.
CMS-generated data reports, including the Dialysis Facility Reports (DFR) are available to
facilities to help them focus their QAPI improvement programs. Each facility should be
comparing their performance with community-based standards and with other facilities in their
State, their Network and the U.S. and working to improve their outcomes where needed. This
Page 246 of 420
comparative data is readily available to all facilities, whether they are corporate-owned or
independent.
QAPI requires the use of aggregate patient data to evaluate the facility patient outcomes.
Hemodialysis patients and peritoneal dialysis patients should be reviewed separately since
factors affecting their clinical outcomes may be different; both groups of patients must be
reviewed on an ongoing basis.
Data related to patient outcomes, complaints, medical injuries, and medical errors (e.g., clinical
variances, occurrences, and adverse events) should be used to identify potential problems and to
identify opportunities for improving care. Some common areas for dialysis care and facility
operations that should be in the QAPI program for monitoring include, mortality, hospitalization
rates, readmission rates, psychosocial assessment completion rates, water and dialysate quality
monitoring, dialysis equipment maintenance, and equipment repairs.
Data should be analyzed by the IDT on an ongoing basis. Based upon the data review, the IDT
should discuss the areas which need improvement and develop, implement, and evaluate a plan
for such improvement. The facility may use broadly accepted, community-developed standards
(e.g.,NKF KDOQI, AAMI) as indicators or performance measures associated with improved
health outcomes. Where minimum outcome values have been determined, facilities are expected
to provide care directed at achievement of at least the minimum outcome value by all patients.
The IDT must work with individual patients who do not reach the target; this work must be
reflected in the patient’s plan of care for that outcome. Refer to the applicable tag under the
Condition for plan of care for individual patient issues.
History
Rev.
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
67c32f5bf10e1ad3b1f3f1f9f5913bfb6e18256f4c6337a91ad027469e760008
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.