Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS SOM App. H, Tag V628

§ 494.110 (a)(2) – The dialysis facility must measure, analyze, and track quality indicators

activein force · 2026-07-22 – presentas-observed

or other aspects of performance that the facility adopts or develops that reflect processes of

care and facility operations. These performance components must influence or relate to the

desired outcomes or be the outcomes themselves. The program must include, but not be

limited to, the following:…

Interpretive Guidance § 494.110 (a)(2):

The facility’s QAPI program monitors the assessment and improvement of care in the facility.

CMS-generated data reports, including the Dialysis Facility Reports (DFR) are available to

facilities to help them focus their QAPI improvement programs. Each facility should be

comparing their performance with community-based standards and with other facilities in their

State, their Network and the U.S. and working to improve their outcomes where needed. This

Page 246 of 420

comparative data is readily available to all facilities, whether they are corporate-owned or

independent.

QAPI requires the use of aggregate patient data to evaluate the facility patient outcomes.

Hemodialysis patients and peritoneal dialysis patients should be reviewed separately since

factors affecting their clinical outcomes may be different; both groups of patients must be

reviewed on an ongoing basis.

Data related to patient outcomes, complaints, medical injuries, and medical errors (e.g., clinical

variances, occurrences, and adverse events) should be used to identify potential problems and to

identify opportunities for improving care. Some common areas for dialysis care and facility

operations that should be in the QAPI program for monitoring include, mortality, hospitalization

rates, readmission rates, psychosocial assessment completion rates, water and dialysate quality

monitoring, dialysis equipment maintenance, and equipment repairs.

Data should be analyzed by the IDT on an ongoing basis. Based upon the data review, the IDT

should discuss the areas which need improvement and develop, implement, and evaluate a plan

for such improvement. The facility may use broadly accepted, community-developed standards

(e.g.,NKF KDOQI, AAMI) as indicators or performance measures associated with improved

health outcomes. Where minimum outcome values have been determined, facilities are expected

to provide care directed at achievement of at least the minimum outcome value by all patients.

The IDT must work with individual patients who do not reach the target; this work must be

reflected in the patient’s plan of care for that outcome. Refer to the applicable tag under the

Condition for plan of care for individual patient issues.

History

Rev.

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-07-22
Edition
som-2026-07-22
Content hash
67c32f5bf10e1ad3b1f3f1f9f5913bfb6e18256f4c6337a91ad027469e760008
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.