US · guidance
CMS SOM App. H, Tag V559
§ 494.90(b) Standard: Implementation of the patient plan of care
(3) If the expected
outcome is not achieved, the interdisciplinary team must adjust the patient’s plan of care to
achieve the specified goals. When a patient is unable to achieve the desired outcomes, the
team must—
(i) Adjust the plan of care to reflect the patient’s current condition;
(ii) Document in the record the reasons why the patient was unable to achieve the goals;
and
(iii) Implement plan of care changes to address the issues identified in paragraph (b)(3)(ii)
of this section.
Interpretive Guidance § 494.90(b)(3)(i), (ii) and (iii)
If the current plan of care has not been successful in achieving the goals identified by and for the
patient within the identified timetables, there must be evidence that barriers to achievement of
the goals were identified and that the plan was reviewed and revised, as indicated. For example,
if the patient’s Kt/V is below the expected goal for more than one month, the physician or the
non-physician practitioner might adjust the dialysis prescription by extending the treatment time
or changing the dialyzer. If the patient’s Kt/V remained below target the following month, the
team should collaboratively identify the potential reasons the patient is not reaching the
minimum goal for hemodialysis adequacy and implement changes in the plan of care to address
and resolve the identified barriers. This example would not require a reassessment and
completely new plan of care; if this is the only area where the goal was not met, the patient could
be considered “stable,” and only the plan of care for adequacy would require adjustment.
This requirement is not met if the patient’s plan of care is not adjusted to reflect the patient’s
current condition and there is no evidence that the IDT is working to address ongoing problems
(e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, hyperkalemia, missed treatments, inaccurate or unattainable
target weight) which may result in adverse outcomes for the patient. This requirement is not
satisfied if the only reason documented for failure to achieve goal(s) is “patient noncompliance”
or “non-adherence.” If the team believes the cause of the failure to reach the goal is non-
Page 223 of 420
adherence, the IDT efforts should focus on identifying potential causes of the non-adherence and
addressing those causes. The IDT must recognize each patient has the right to choose less than
optimal care when the patient determines optimal care would negatively impact their quality of
life.
These regulations require the IDT to demonstrate its members are actively attempting to meet
each patient’s plan of care goals. This Condition does not “require” a patient to meet every
goal. Any member of the IDT, including the patient, may document why goals are not met or
cannot be met.
History
Rev.
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
792caeed0c30480a839a982907be4e3733074edda56d0693d4b53dfeaae172d2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.