Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS SOM App. H, Tag V513

§ 494.80(a) Standard: Assessment criteria

activein force · 2026-07-22 – presentas-observed

The patient’s comprehensive assessment must

include, but is not limited to, the following: (10) Evaluation of suitability for a

transplantation referral, based on criteria developed by the prospective transplantation

center and its surgeon(s). If the patient is not suitable for transplantation referral, the basis

for non-referral must be documented in the patient’s medical record.

Interpretive Guidance §494.80(a)(10)

The IDT comprehensive assessment must demonstrate that each patient is evaluated for

suitability for transplantation referral, using selection/exclusion criteria provided by the

transplant program.

The regulations for transplant programs require the development and provision of written

selection criteria upon request to patients and dialysis facilities. Selection criteria vary among

transplant programs. If a dialysis facility refers patients to multiple transplant programs, the

facility should have the selection criteria for each program on file and available to patients.

Additionally, patients are free to select a transplant program other than the ones normally

utilized by the dialysis facility for referrals.

Page 202 of 420

If the assessment finds a patient is not suitable for transplantation, the reason for the non-referral should be documented as part of the comprehensive assessment.

The requirements for the plan of care for transplant status are at V554.

History

Rev.

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-07-22
Edition
som-2026-07-22
Content hash
4ef144c5f0a69b033a2c33848f799308acc39a57afb37b0f3a63703bf65c350b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.