US · guidance
CMS SOM App. H, Tag V360
ANSI/AAMI RD47:2002/A1:2003 Requirements as Adopted by Reference 42 CFR
494.50(b)(1)
14 Quality assurance (internal standards and clinical outcomes)
The criteria chosen as the internal standards of a facility shall be documented in its policy
and/or procedure manual. Process review should be part of the activity of the individual
carrying out the process, and oversight of that review by another qualified member of the
staff or a group of staff members should affirm, modify, or repeat these observations to
confirm or improve the process.
Clinical outcomes serve as the most important indicator of quality of all dialysis treatment
practices including reuse. Final oversight is the responsibility of the medical director. See
Table 2 for a summary of the audit schedule.
14.1 Records
A record of review, comments, trend analysis, and conclusions arising from QA practices
serve as a foundation for future review and as documentation to external evaluation.
Interpretive Guidance § 494.50(b)(1)
A.14 Quality assurance
The FDA’s 1987 compliance policy guide (7124.16) advises reuse practitioners to establish the
following: (a) adequate device cleaning and sterilization; (b) the lack of adverse effects on
device quality or physical characteristics; and (c) certainty that the device remains safe,
reliable, and effective for its intended use. The [AAMI RDD] Committee believes that
compliance with those recommendations necessitates use of regularly examined reprocessing
Page 163 of 420
procedures that are based on methods of demonstrated effectiveness and are carried out under
conditions safe to the patient and the personnel.
Table 2—Quality assurance audit schedule
Monthly Quarterly Semi-Annually
Annually
Patient information policy (14.3) X
Equipment manuals and procedures (14.4) X
Equipment maintenance and repair policies
(14.4)
X
Environmental safety (8.1) X
Environmental safety (8.2) X
Environmental safety (8.4) X
Reprocessing supplies (9) X
Water treatment* (11.4.1.5) X
Hemodialyzer labeling (10) X
Reprocessing procedures** (14.8) X X
Procedures for preparation for dialysis
(14.9)
X
* More frequent monitoring may be required initially as described in 11.4.1.5.
**These functions may allow for a less frequent review period, as indicated in their respective
sections, according to the specified circumstances. **
Note: Numbers in parentheses refer to AAMI sections.
Additional Guidance:
The QAPI Condition at § 494.100 (Tag V625) requires the facility’s quality improvement
program to reflect the complexity of the dialysis facility’s organization and the services it
provides. In other words, if a dialysis facility’s services include reuse, reuse audits must be
performed on the required schedule and reported in the QAPI activities. For many of the audits,
there is a two-tier system of review required: the review of the process by the person assigned
(i.e., reprocessing by the reuse technician), and oversight of that review by another person
qualified to do so (i.e., the technical supervisor observing the reuse technician performing
reprocessing).
If the facility participates in a centralized reprocessing program, the QA audits done in the
reprocessing facility must be provided to the patient treatment facility and reviewed as part of
Page 164 of 420
the QAPI of that facility. Any complaints related to the reprocessing of dialyzers would need to
be reported to the patient treatment facility sending the applicable dialyzers.
History
Rev.
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
f7f73518cffb1dd4758b9bd349835baa6d53bd1f5e0d016ea7869911e9646624
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.