US · guidance
CMS SOM App. H, Tag V249
ANSI/AAMI RD52:2004 Requirements as Adopted by Reference 42 CFR 494.40(a)
5.6 Dialysate proportioning (dialysis machine recalibration)
6.6 Dialysate proportioning
5.6 Dialysate proportioning (dialysis machine recalibration)
[C]hanging from one proportioning ratio to another requires recalibration for some models
of dialysis machines. Thus, for those machines, the type of concentrate should be labeled on
the machine or clearly indicated by the machine display. It is strongly recommended that
facilities configure every machine to use only one type of concentrate.
6.6 Dialysate proportioning
Dialysate proportioning should be monitored following the procedures specified by the
equipment manufacturer. The user should maintain a record of critical parameters such as
conductivity and approximate pH. When the user has specific requirements for monitoring
dialysate proportioning, such as when dialysis machine settings are changed to allow the
use of concentrates with a different proportioning ratio, the user should develop
procedures for routine monitoring of dialysate electrolyte values.
Page 102 of 420
Interpretive Guidance § 494.40(a)
ANSI/AAMI RD52:2004
5.6 Dialysate proportioning
Some models of dialysis machines can use concentrates of only one type of proportioning ratio,
but others may be set up or calibrated for use with concentrates of more than one proportioning
type.
Additional Guidance:
The medical director and responsible staff should be knowledgeable of the mixing ratio the
machines are set up to use and all dialysate supplies in the facility must match that ratio.
Rarely, a facility may have machines set for different ratios; this is a risky practice and would
require very close monitoring to prevent a mismatch of supplies and machines. If machines are
available for different ratios in the same facility, each machine should be clearly labeled for the
applicable ratio and supplies for the different ratios should be segregated and labeled clearly to
avoid mismatch. The medical director should be aware of this practice and be involved in quality
control to avoid any patient consequence from potential mismatch of supplies and machines.
If machines are changed from one ratio to another, responsible staff members should be able to
describe how they verified the machine functioned correctly after the change was made and how
they monitored the dialysate electrolyte values.
History
Rev.
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
bc03519cbdc9008db6e22b1abf71d21798b3da0662e10478bf7a61f34d81a5e8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.