US · guidance
CMS SOM App. H, Tag V192
ANSI/AAMI RD52:2004 Requirements as Adopted by Reference 42 CFR 494.40(a)
5.2.5 Carbon adsorption
Two carbon beds shall be installed in series with a sample port following the first bed. A
sample port shall also be installed following the second bed for use in the event of free
chlorine or chloramine breaking through the first bed.
Refer to RD62:2001, 4.3.9 Carbon adsorption media: Carbon adsorption systems shall be
adapted specifically to the maximum anticipated water flow rate of the system. Two carbon
adsorption beds shall be installed in a series configuration.
Interpretive Guidance § 494.40(a)
ANSI/AAMI RD52:2004
5.2.5 Carbon adsorption
Carbon adsorption systems, often referred to as carbon filters, are the principal means of
removing both free chlorine and chloramine.
Page 52 of 420
Removal of free chlorine to a maximum level of 0.5 mg/L and chloramine to a maximum level of
<0.1 mg/L is necessary to protect hemodialysis patients from red cell hemolysis. In addition, free
chlorine may also degrade some reverse osmosis membranes, depending on the membrane
material.
AAMI Rationale for the Development and Provision of This Practice
A.5.2.5 Carbon adsorption
Although treatment of water by carbon adsorption is the method usually used to meet these
requirements for chloramines, the AAMI RDD Committee recognized that in certain situations,
carbon adsorption might not adequately remove chloramines. Inadequate removal of
chloramines may occur when the chloramines are in the form of naturally occurring N-
chloramines or when practices such as the use of high pH or the inclusion of orthophosphate or
polyphosphates are used (by the supplier’s water treatment plant) to comply with the EPA’s lead
and copper rule. In such circumstances, other strategies for chloramine removal may be needed
to supplement carbon adsorption. The AAMI RDD Committee is aware that adding sodium
metabisulfite prior to the reverse osmosis system has been successful in eliminating chloramine
in hemodialysis applications.
Other means of removing chloramines, such as redox alloy media and ultraviolet irradiation at
185 nm, are used in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries. These processes are currently
being evaluated for hemodialysis applications. The final choice of a system for chloramine
removal in hemodialysis settings will depend on local conditions and may require the inclusion
of more than one of the processes outlined above.
Additional Guidance: If a facility has employed supplemental strategies for chlorine removal,
these should be in addition to the use of at least two carbon tanks that hold the carbon beds. The
medical director and the chief technician should be able to discuss the rationale for the use of
supplemental strategies. Facility records should document the systems in place to protect
patients from exposure to chlorine and chloramine, and these systems should be monitored
according to the manufacturer’s directions.
History
Rev.
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
d66fe0d8a54f9d090ee3e4d90834e9a33938d79116ffa9ebaa7c93f3a856f6dc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.