US · guidance
CMS SOM App. C, Tag D5805
§493.1291 Standard: Test report
(c) The test report must indicate the following:
(c)(1) For positive patient identification, either the patient’s name and identification
number, or a unique patient identifier and identification number.
Interpretive Guidelines §493.1291(c)(1) - (c)(6)
Use D5203 for deficiencies related to specimen identification problems.
When used on the test report, the patient’s name must be accompanied by an
identification or accession number. When for confidentiality purposes a patient’s name is
not used or when the identity of the person is not known, a unique patient identifier and
identification or accession number must be used on the report.
(c)(2) The name and address of the laboratory location where the test was
performed.
Interpretive Guidelines §493.1291(c)(2)
Laboratories having a single certificate for multiple sites/locations must have a system in
place to identify which tests were performed at each site. When testing is performed in
more than one location in a hospital, the specific location in the hospital must be stated
on the laboratory report (for example, ER, NICU, etc.)
A code to identify the name and address of the laboratory performing testing is
acceptable as long as the code is clearly annotated on the patient test report. This may be
accomplished by using abbreviated indicators (e.g., asterisks) as long as they are
identified and apparent to the individual receiving the report. This or a similar system
may be seen on cumulative reports. The name and address of the reference laboratory
may also be defined on a subsequent page or on the back of the report. Laboratories have
latitude to develop other formats to meet this requirement.
§493.1291 Standard: Test report.
(c)(3) The test report date.
Interpretive Guidelines §493.1291(c)(3)
The date of the test report is the date results were generated as a final report and must not
change on copies or electronic reports generated at a later date.
If a preliminary result is generated, it should be clearly labeled and include the date of the
preliminary report, to differentiate it from the final test result in the final report or in the
electronic reporting system.
If a laboratory test order contains multiple tests and these tests are completed on different
days, the report should show when each test was completed.
Example:
An order for CBC, CMP and HIV is received in the lab and completed on
8/14/23, each test must show 8/14/23 as test report date.
On the other hand, if the CBC and CMP were completed on 8/14/23, but the
HIV was completed on 8/15/23, the report date must be as follows:
CBC: 8/14/23
CMP: 8/14/23
HIV: 8/15/23
(c)(4) The test performed.
Interpretive Guidelines §493.1291(c)(4)
The laboratory must establish performance specifications in accordance with
§493.1253(b)(2), and must make them available to clients in accordance with
§493.1291(e).
(c)(5) Specimen source, when appropriate.
Interpretive Guidelines §493.1291(c)(5)
Some examples of source of the specimen needed by the laboratory to accurately perform
testing and report results would be: type of body fluid; whether a submitted separated
specimen is plasma, serum, urine, etc.
§493.1291 Standard: Test report.
(c)(6) The test result and, if applicable, the units of measurement or interpretation,
or both.
Interpretive Guidelines §493.1291(c)(6)
If the laboratory prints normal ranges on the patient test report, verify that appropriate
normal ranges (e.g., age specific) are printed by the LIS on the patient test report.
“Less than” is used for reporting test results (qualitative or quantitative) that are below
the laboratory’s detection limits for an analyte. (Detection limits must be established
through method verification as described in §493.1253.)
“Equivalent designation” is used to report test results for those methods that yield results
below a clinically significant level (e.g., for a quantitative immunology test, patient
results may be clinically negative at a 1:8 titer and test results may be reported as “1:8
negative”. The normal range is 1:8 or less.)
“Greater than” is used for reporting test results (qualitative or quantitative) that are above
the laboratory’s detection limits for an analyte. If patient test results exceed the
laboratory’s reportable range, the laboratory must report the result as greater than the
highest detection limit, reassay a diluted patient specimen and report the calculated result,
or send the specimen to a reference laboratory.
For flow cytometry, to interpret results, staff should have access to the complementary
clinical picture of the patient. This may include such results as white cell count, cell
differential, cell morphology, and cytogenetics.
Flow cytometry patient data files should include any gating analysis regions used to
obtain reported test results.
For genetic tests, the laboratory should include the test method(s) employed, any variants
that were detected, and any additional information that may affect the interpretation of
the test results, such as software or program names and versions that assist in the analysis
and interpretation of the genetic data, if applicable, on the test report.
Probes §493.1291(c)(6)
When additional information is critical for the interpretation of test results (e.g.,
screening vs. confirmatory procedures, interpretation software), how does the laboratory
convey this information to the individual ordering or using test results?
If the laboratory does not print normal ranges on the test report, how does the laboratory
notify the client that reported results are abnormal for the patient due to their particular
sex and/or age?
How does the laboratory convey updates to the analysis and interpretation software to the
individual ordering or using the test results?
§493.1291 Standard: Test report.
(c)(7) Any information regarding the condition and disposition of specimens that do
not meet the laboratory’s criteria for acceptability.
Interpretive Guidelines §493.1291(c)(7)
If the laboratory functions as a reference laboratory, how does it notify the referring
laboratory or client of unacceptable specimens in a timely manner? Use D5801 to cite
timeliness deficiencies. Use D5805 to cite the referring laboratory’s failure to notify the
appropriate individual concerning the unacceptable specimen.
History
Rev. 233; Issued: 09-12-25; Effective: 09-12-25; Implementation: 09-12-25
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
875e862f7dc2ebd9e0264c2594b571b0e7a2a4ad3696bf830af0207c8bc74b55
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.