Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS SOM App. C, Tag D5793

§493.1289 Standard: Analytic systems quality assessment

activein force · 2026-07-22 – presentas-observed

(b) The analytic systems quality assessment must include a review of the

effectiveness of corrective actions taken to resolve problems, revision of policies and

procedures necessary to prevent recurrence of problems, and discussion of analytic

systems quality assessment reviews with appropriate staff.

Interpretive Guidelines §493.1289(b)

Verify that the laboratory has a system in place to monitor and evaluate test results for

inconsistencies with patient information, and for correlation between test results. For

example, a laboratory could multiply the hemoglobin result by a factor of 3, to see if the

result is equal to the hematocrit. If the laboratory has auto-validation in its Laboratory

Information System (LIS), verify that the laboratory is taking steps to reduce the

likelihood of sample-switching errors, for example, when the creatinine result is

significantly different from the patient’s previous creatinine test results, or if the MCV is

significantly different from the patient’s previous test results and the patient did not

receive a blood transfusion.

Probes §493.1289(b)

How does the laboratory address multiple failed or sub-optimal cultures that have been

submitted from one client?

How does the laboratory use the review of all normal or negative gynecologic specimens

received within the previous 5 years to assess the analytic system and communicate

findings to the staff?

(c) The laboratory must document all analytic systems assessment activities.

Interpretive Guidelines §493.1289(c)

The steps taken by the laboratory to identify and correct problems and prevent their

recurrence must be documented. All laboratory policies amended due to its QA activities

must also be noted.

POSTANALYTIC SYSTEMS

History

Rev. 233; Issued: 09-12-25; Effective: 09-12-25; Implementation: 09-12-25

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-07-22
Edition
som-2026-07-22
Content hash
c3c98d0e72599f582e7e6f3ebf7141839584ae8bc9d9d0f83ad321c693ae9bff
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.