US · guidance
CMS SOM App. C, Tag D5765
§493.1278 Standard: Histocompatibility
(d)(2) Have available and follow written criteria for the following:
(d)(2)(i) Defining donor and recipient HLA antigens, alleles, and antibodies to be
tested;
(d)(2)(ii) Defining the criteria necessary to assess a recipient’s alloantibody status;
Probe §493.1278(d)(2)(ii)
What criteria does the laboratory use to determine the recipient's sensitization history and
current alloantibody status? Examples include, but are not limited to, prior transplants or
transfusions, and pregnancy status.
(d)(2)(iii) Assessing recipient antibody presence or absence on an ongoing basis;
Probe §493.1278(d)(2)(iii)
When additional information is critical for the interpretation of test results, how does the
laboratory convey this information to the individual ordering or using test results? For
example, if the laboratory reports the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), have they
included an interpretation that allows the transplant service clinician to determine if a
transplant is contraindicated?
If pertinent information is missing, cite at D5805.
(d)(2)(iv) Typing the donor, to include those HLA antigens to which antibodies have
been identified in the potential recipient, as applicable;
Interpretive Guidelines §493.1278(d)(2)(iv)
Laboratories that use different methods to type donors and/or recipients should assess
compatibility between donors and recipients, as needed based on the typing method used.
For example, compatibility of a donor typed at the serological level should be determined
for a recipient with antibodies that have been identified at the allele level.
(d)(2)(v) Describing the circumstances in which pre- and post-transplant
confirmation testing of donor and recipient specimens is required;
(d)(2)(vi) Making available all applicable donor and recipient test results to the
transplant team;
Probe §493.1278(d)(2)(vi)
When additional information is critical for the interpretation of test results, how does the
laboratory convey this information to the individual ordering or using test results? If
pertinent information is missing, cite at D5805. Example: If the laboratory reports MFI
(Mean Fluorescence Intensity) value, have they included an interpretation?
(d)(2)(vii) Ensuring immunologic assessments are based on test results obtained
from a test report from a CLIA-certified laboratory; and
Probe §493.1278(d)(2)(vii)
How does the laboratory ensure that testing is performed by a CLIA-certified laboratory?
(d)(2)(viii) Defining time limits between recipient testing and the performance of a
crossmatch.
Probe §493.1278(d)(2)(viii)
What are the criteria for defining time limits between recipient testing and the
performance of a crossmatch?
History
Rev. 233; Issued: 09-12-25; Effective: 09-12-25; Implementation: 09-12-25
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
7883550dd86116dff7ae7b4b842420bc2ef677f82df2a55c299657868bdf2423
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.