Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS SOM App. C, Tag D5765

§493.1278 Standard: Histocompatibility

activein force · 2026-07-22 – presentas-observed

(d)(2) Have available and follow written criteria for the following:

(d)(2)(i) Defining donor and recipient HLA antigens, alleles, and antibodies to be

tested;

(d)(2)(ii) Defining the criteria necessary to assess a recipient’s alloantibody status;

Probe §493.1278(d)(2)(ii)

What criteria does the laboratory use to determine the recipient's sensitization history and

current alloantibody status? Examples include, but are not limited to, prior transplants or

transfusions, and pregnancy status.

(d)(2)(iii) Assessing recipient antibody presence or absence on an ongoing basis;

Probe §493.1278(d)(2)(iii)

When additional information is critical for the interpretation of test results, how does the

laboratory convey this information to the individual ordering or using test results? For

example, if the laboratory reports the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), have they

included an interpretation that allows the transplant service clinician to determine if a

transplant is contraindicated?

If pertinent information is missing, cite at D5805.

(d)(2)(iv) Typing the donor, to include those HLA antigens to which antibodies have

been identified in the potential recipient, as applicable;

Interpretive Guidelines §493.1278(d)(2)(iv)

Laboratories that use different methods to type donors and/or recipients should assess

compatibility between donors and recipients, as needed based on the typing method used.

For example, compatibility of a donor typed at the serological level should be determined

for a recipient with antibodies that have been identified at the allele level.

(d)(2)(v) Describing the circumstances in which pre- and post-transplant

confirmation testing of donor and recipient specimens is required;

(d)(2)(vi) Making available all applicable donor and recipient test results to the

transplant team;

Probe §493.1278(d)(2)(vi)

When additional information is critical for the interpretation of test results, how does the

laboratory convey this information to the individual ordering or using test results? If

pertinent information is missing, cite at D5805. Example: If the laboratory reports MFI

(Mean Fluorescence Intensity) value, have they included an interpretation?

(d)(2)(vii) Ensuring immunologic assessments are based on test results obtained

from a test report from a CLIA-certified laboratory; and

Probe §493.1278(d)(2)(vii)

How does the laboratory ensure that testing is performed by a CLIA-certified laboratory?

(d)(2)(viii) Defining time limits between recipient testing and the performance of a

crossmatch.

Probe §493.1278(d)(2)(viii)

What are the criteria for defining time limits between recipient testing and the

performance of a crossmatch?

History

Rev. 233; Issued: 09-12-25; Effective: 09-12-25; Implementation: 09-12-25

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-07-22
Edition
som-2026-07-22
Content hash
7883550dd86116dff7ae7b4b842420bc2ef677f82df2a55c299657868bdf2423
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.