US · guidance
CMS SOM App. C, Tag D5619
§493.1274 Standard: Cytology
(b)(3) Nongynecologic specimens that have a high potential for cross-contamination
must be stained separately from other nongynecologic specimens, and the stains
must be filtered or changed following staining.
Interpretive Guidelines §493.1274(b)(3)
A monochromatic stain such as toluidine blue may be used to determine the cellularity of
nongynecologic specimens. Once a specimen has been concentrated, usually by
centrifugation, a small drop of specimen is placed on a slide. A drop of stain is placed
next to the specimen, allowed to mix, and coverslipped. Cellularity is evaluated
microscopically. Highly cellular specimens have a high potential for cross-contamination. One option would be for the laboratory to stain these specimens after
routine staining has been completed.
Laboratories which use automated staining methodologies must follow the
manufacturer’s instructions. Use D5411.
Probes §493.1274(b)(3)
How is the cellularity of nongynecologic specimens checked prior to cytopreparation
(staining)?
What procedure does the laboratory use to determine which specimens must be stained
separately?
§493.1274 Standard: Cytology.
(c) Control Procedures. The laboratory must establish and follow written policies
and procedures for a program designed to detect errors in the performance of
cytologic examinations and the reporting of results. The program must include the
following:
History
Rev. 233; Issued: 09-12-25; Effective: 09-12-25; Implementation: 09-12-25
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
165d9b873f0a254ae7182cb2110800c5b756e0abb3eae0a4a202737bab0d4119
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.