Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS SOM App. C, Tag D5551

§493.1271 Standard: Immunohematology

activein force · 2026-07-22 – presentas-observed

(a) Patient testing.

(a)(1) The laboratory must perform ABO grouping, D (Rho)

typing, unexpected antibody detection, antibody identification, and compatibility

testing by following the manufacturer’s instructions, if provided, and as applicable,

21 CFR 606.151(a) through (e).

Interpretive Guidelines §493.1271(a)(1)

21 CFR §606.151 requires the following standard operating procedures for compatibility

testing:

a. A method of collecting and identifying the blood samples of recipients to ensure

positive identification.

b. The use of fresh recipient serum or plasma samples less than 3 days old for all

pretransfusion testing if the recipient has been pregnant or transfused within the

previous 3 months.

NOTE: If information on the patient’s history of transfusion or pregnancy is not

available, then a fresh specimen is to be used.

c. Procedures to demonstrate incompatibility between the donor’s cell type and the

recipient’s serum or plasma type.

NOTE: These procedures may consist of a serologic crossmatch, or a computer

crossmatch. The computer crossmatch is a process of ensuring that a unit of

blood is compatible with a specified recipient by means of electronically

matching patient pretransfusion test results (ABO/Rh, etc.) with information

about the blood donor that is stored in the LIS. The computer crossmatch is not

strictly a “test” under CLIA; however, laboratories using this procedure must

ensure that the LIS functions as intended. Refer to FDA Guidance for Industry:

“Computer Crossmatch” (Computerized Analysis of the Compatibility between

the Donor’s Cell Type and the Recipient’s Serum or Plasma Type).

https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/computer-crossmatch-computerized-analysis-compatibility-between-

donors-cell-type-and-recipients.

NOTE: Laboratories using an immediate spin or computer crossmatch should

have policies on the use of an antiglobulin crossmatch when warranted.

d. A provision that, if the unit of donor's blood has not been screened by a method

that will demonstrate agglutinating, coating and hemolytic antibodies, the

recipient's cells shall be tested with the donor's serum (minor crossmatch) by a

method that will so demonstrate.

e. Procedures to expedite transfusion in life-threatening emergencies. Records of all

such incidents shall be maintained, including complete documentation justifying

the emergency action, which shall be signed by a physician.

The laboratory must maintain complete documentation, signed by a physician, which

justifies the emergency action.

When condition-level deficiencies in Immunohematology are identified in any or all

phases of testing, use D5026.

Transfusion-related immunohematology testing performed on blood donors and

recipients to determine compatibility is considered high complexity testing. When

performed on blood donors or recipients, the following analytes are always high

complexity: ABO group/ D (Rho) typing/antigen typing, direct antiglobulin tests, tests for

unexpected antibody detection and identification, and crossmatch procedures. If

personnel do not meet the qualifications or fulfill the responsibilities for high complexity

testing, cite under subpart M—Personnel for Nonwaived Testing.

There generally are no daily quality control requirements for reagent red cell panels used

in antibody identification. However, we encourage laboratories to follow the

manufacturer’s recommendations for QC.

For laboratories using multiple racks of reagent typing sera and cells, laboratories should

perform quality control on a representative sample of each lot of reagent in use on each

day of testing. In addition, quality control needs to be performed on each new lot of

reagent when first used.

When in-date reagents are unavailable, it may become necessary to frame written policies

for their temporary use beyond their expiration dates until non-expired supplies become

available. Under no circumstances, however, should a laboratory adopt policies that

would allow for the regular use of expired reagents.

Determine if the laboratory has policies regarding:

• Compatibility testing for patients with a history of a prior antibody;

• Compatibility testing for patients with no history of a prior antibody; and

• Course of action to be taken for positive antibody screening and/or incompatible

crossmatch.

Probes §493.1271(a)(1)

If the patient has been previously tested, how are results of current testing compared with

interpretations of previous testing? When the results of current testing are discrepant

with results of previous testing, how has the laboratory resolved the difference? Use

D5777.

§493.1271 Standard: Immunohematology.

(a)(2) The laboratory must determine ABO group by concurrently testing unknown

red cells with, at a minimum, anti-A and anti-B grouping reagents. For

confirmation of ABO group, the unknown serum must be tested with known A1 and

B red cells.

Interpretive Guidelines §493.1271(a)(2)

Determine if the laboratory has a policy to detect and resolve ABO discrepancies. If the

laboratory does not have such procedures, use D5401. If the laboratory does not use

patient records to confirm ABO group (i.e., current testing compared with historical

records when available), use D5777.

(a)(3) The laboratory must determine the D (Rho) type by testing unknown red cells

with anti-D (anti-Rho) blood typing reagent.

Interpretive Guidelines §493.1271(a)(3)

Determine if the laboratory has established a policy specifying when testing for weak D

must be performed.

Probes §493.1271(a)(3)

Is the laboratory following this policy?

History

Rev. 233; Issued: 09-12-25; Effective: 09-12-25; Implementation: 09-12-25

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-07-22
Edition
som-2026-07-22
Content hash
3b262d5360d777191afe33e1e5150bbf44d9c1be250a7c314938a01cfa32bf5a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.