US · guidance
CMS SOM App. C, Tag D5439
§493.1255 Standard: Calibration and calibration verification
procedures.
(b) Perform and document calibration verification procedure -
(b)(1) Following the manufacturer’s calibration verification instructions;
(b)(2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory under
§493.1253(b)(3)--
(b)(2)(i) Including the number, type, and concentration of the materials, as well as
acceptable limits for calibration verification; and
(b)(2)(ii) Including at least a minimal (or zero) value, a mid-point value, and a
maximum value near the upper limit of the range to verify the laboratory’s
reportable range of test results for the test system; and
(b)(3) At least once every 6 months and whenever any of the following occur:
(b)(3)(i) A complete change of reagents for a procedure is introduced, unless the
laboratory can demonstrate that changing reagent lot numbers does not affect the
range used to report patient test results, and control values are not adversely
affected by reagent lot number changes.
(b)(3)(ii) There is major preventive maintenance or replacement of critical parts
that may influence test performance.
(b)(3)(iii) Control materials reflect an unusual trend or shift, or are outside of the
laboratory’s acceptable limits, and other means of assessing and correcting
unacceptable control values fail to identify and correct the problem.
(b)(3)(iv) The laboratory’s established schedule for verifying the reportable range
for patient test results requires more frequent calibration verification.
Interpretive Guidelines §493.1255(b)
The calibration verification requirements may be met by verifying the procedure using a
high-level material such as a control, calibration material, or patient specimen and
diluting it to cover the reportable range if allowed by the manufacturer.
Control activities routinely used to satisfy the requirement for §493.1256 do not satisfy
the calibration verification requirements.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Laboratories must perform and document calibration procedures following the
manufacturer’s test system instructions, using calibration materials provided or specified,
and at a frequency that is recommended by the manufacturer. Where the manufacturer
does not provide such instruction, the laboratory may calibrate using 3 or more levels of
calibration materials that include a low, mid, and high value at least every 6 months.
2. If the laboratory performs a calibration protocol using 3 or more levels of calibration
materials that include a low, mid, and high value at least every 6 months, the calibration
verification requirement is met.
3. For automated cell counters, the calibration verification requirements are considered
met if the laboratory follows the manufacturer’s instructions for instrument operation and
tests 2 levels of control materials each day of testing provided the control results meet the
laboratory’s criteria for acceptability. This exception does not apply to centrifugal
hematology test systems.
4. For automated chemistry analyzers, the calibration verification requirements are
considered met if the laboratory follows the manufacturer’s instructions for instrument
operation and routinely tests three levels of control materials (lowest level available, mid-level, and highest level available) more than once each day of testing, the control material
results meet the laboratory’s criteria for acceptability and the control materials are
traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) reference materials.
Calibration materials, proficiency testing samples with known results, or control
materials with known values may be used to perform calibration verification. For these
materials, the laboratory must define acceptable limits for the difference between the
measured value obtained, versus the actual concentration of the materials.
NOTE: PT samples can only be used after the event cut-off date.
“Calibration material” means a solution that has a known amount of analyte weighed in,
has a value determined by repetitive testing using a reference/definitive test method or is
traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) reference material, if
possible.
If a manufacturer provides reagents for a test where all of the reagents for a test are
packaged together, calibration verification is not required for each additional reagent
package with the same lot number that is received in the same shipment. For example, if
the laboratory receives 12 packs of reagents and the laboratory has verified calibration for
at least one of the 12 packs of reagents, then the laboratory does not have to verify
calibration for the remaining 11 packs of reagents provided that all 12 packs of reagents
have the same lot number and were received on the same shipment to the laboratory.
However, this exception does not override the requirement to perform calibration
verification as specified at 493.1255(b)(3).
5. Calibration verification is not required on:
• Instruments that are factory or manufacturer calibrated and/or
• Tests that are considered non-quantitative (e.g., Prothrombin time and Activated
Clotting Time, which are measured in units of time)
When reviewing the laboratory’s maintenance and function check records as required in
§493.1254, determine whether the laboratory performed calibration verification when
major maintenance occurred or critical parts were replaced.
The actual measurement(s) taken, reactions and/or observations must be recorded.
Probes §493.1255(b)
If a laboratory does not perform calibration verification after a complete change of
reagents, what data does the laboratory have to document that changing reagent lot
numbers does not affect the reportable range of patient test results, and does not
adversely affect control results?
History
Rev. 233; Issued: 09-12-25; Effective: 09-12-25; Implementation: 09-12-25
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
e2bbe9b725b9c09663ddb19b7172e2bfd798cd504a851864be2c3847c51f3ea9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.