US · guidance
CMS SOM App. A, Tag A-1693
§482.62(b)(2) The director must monitor and evaluate the quality and
appropriateness of services and treatment provided by the medical staff.
Interpretive Guidelines §482.62(b)(2)
Services and treatment prescribed to patients must be in accordance with appropriate and
acceptable standards of practice. The clinical director must show evidence of direct
involvement in monitoring and evaluating the quality and appropriateness of all clinical
services and treatment. Oversight and involvement may include:
• Participating in the credentialing and privileging process which includes
recommendations to the governing body,
• Ongoing review of medical staff performance,
• Reviewing clinical outcomes,
• Being involved in peer review process, and
• Collaborating with other disciplines to identify and discuss issues related to the
medical staff.
Additionally, oversight and monitoring may include:
• Attending clinical rounds with the medical staff,
• Performing medical record reviews, and
• Observing the provision of care by medical staff.
The clinical director and hospital’s governing body must approve policies and
procedures that establish a system for overseeing and evaluating the quality of the
clinical services provided by the medical staff. Policies include the process, criteria and
frequency for evaluating the medical staff performance in providing clinical services.
Evaluations should take place at regular intervals specified in the hospital’s policy.
Additionally, in states that allow psychologists and other licensed practitioners to have
admitting privileges, it is still the responsibility of the clinical director to oversee the
quality of the patient’s treatment. In cases where someone other than a psychiatrist
admits a patient, §482.60 requires a physician to be responsible for the patient’s care.
There are a variety ways for monitoring and improving the quality of care provided
within the psychiatric hospital. In accordance with 42 CFR §482.21, the hospital's
Governing Body must ensure that the quality assessment and performance improvement
(QAPI) program reflects the complexity of the hospital's organization and services. The
director of psychiatric services should choose specific indicators related to improved
health outcomes and the prevention and reduction of medical errors to be included in the
overall QAPI program.
Survey Procedures §482.62 (b)(2)
• Interview the clinical director and ask him/her to describe their role and
involvement in the credentialing and privileging process.
• Ask the clinical director to describe the process for ongoing review of the
medical staff.
• What mechanisms are used to monitor and evaluate the work of the medical
staff?
• Is there evidence that the clinical director spends sufficient time at the
hospital monitoring the provision of care by the medical staff?
• Interview the clinical director to determine how he/she addresses problems or
concerns related to the psychiatric services. Interview staff and patients to
determine the effectiveness of clinical director’s interventions.
• Review medical staff meeting minutes and/or Governing Body meeting
minutes to verify the clinical director’s involvement in oversight and
evaluation of the medical staff.
• Review the mechanisms utilized, as reported by the clinical director, to ensure
the quality and appropriateness of psychiatric services and treatment are
monitored.
History
Rev. 238; Issued: 03-20-26; Effective: 09-05-25; Implantation: 09-05-25
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
c8174ef64a113bf9ad1bc04e760c737e4430844d4f9ade925cf6a6ef9acf741b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.