US · guidance
CMS SOM App. A, Tag A-0216
§482.13(h) Standard: Patient visitation rights
A hospital must have written policies and
procedures regarding the visitation rights of patients, including those setting forth any clinically
necessary or reasonable restriction or limitation that the hospital may need to place on such rights
and the reasons for the clinical restriction or limitation. A hospital must meet the following
requirements:
(1) Inform each patient (or support person, where appropriate) of his or her visitation
rights, including any clinical restriction or limitation on such rights, when he or she is informed of
his or her other rights under this section.
(2) Inform each patient (or support person, where appropriate) of the right, subject to his
or her consent, to receive the visitors whom he or she designates, including, but not limited to, a
spouse, a domestic partner (including a same-sex domestic partner), another family member, or a
friend, and his or her right to withdraw or deny such consent at any time.
Interpretive Guidelines §482.13(h)(1)&(2)
Hospitals are required to inform each patient (or the patient’s support person, where appropriate) of
his/her visitation rights. A patient’s “support person” does not necessarily have to be the same person as
the patient’s representative who is legally responsible for making medical decisions on the patient’s
behalf. A support person could be a family member, friend, or other individual who supports the patient
during the course of the hospital stay. Not only may the support person visit the patient, but he or she
may also exercise a patient’s visitation rights on behalf of the patient with respect to other visitors when
the patient is unable to do so. Hospitals must accept a patient’s designation, orally or in writing, of an
individual as the patient’s support person.
When a patient is incapacitated or otherwise unable to communicate his or her wishes and an individual
provides an advance directive designating an individual as the patient’s support person (it is not
necessary for the document to use this exact term), the hospital must accept this designation, provide the
required notice of the patient’s visitation rights, and allow the individual to exercise the patient’s
visitation rights on the patient’s behalf.
When a patient is incapacitated or otherwise unable to communicate his or her wishes, there is no
advance directive designating a representative on file, and no one has presented an advance directive
designating himself or herself as the patient’s representative, but an individual asserts that he or she, as
the patient’s spouse, domestic partner (including a same-sex domestic partner), parent or other family
member, friend, or otherwise, is the patient’s support person, the hospital is expected to accept this
assertion, without demanding supporting documentation, provide the required notice of the patient’s
visitation rights, and allow the individual to exercise the patient’s visitation rights on the patient’s
behalf. However, if more than one individual claims to be the patient’s support person, it would not be
inappropriate for the hospital to ask each individual for documentation supporting his/her claim to be the
patient’s support person.
• Hospitals are expected to adopt policies and procedures that facilitate expeditious and non-discriminatory resolution of disputes about whether an individual is the patient’s support person,
given the critical role of the support person in exercising the patient’s visitation rights.
• A refusal by the hospital of an individual’s request to be treated as the patient’s support person
with respect to visitation rights must be documented in the patient’s medical record, along with
the specific basis for the refusal.
Consistent with the patients’ rights notice requirements under the regulation at §482.13(a)(1), the
required notice of the patient’s visitation rights must be provided, whenever possible, before the hospital
provides or stops care. The notice to the patient, or to the patient’s support person, where appropriate,
must be in writing. If the patient also has a representative who is different from the support person, the
representative must also be provided information on the patient’s visitation rights, in addition to the
support person, if applicable. In the event that a patient has both a representative and a support person
who are not the same individual, and they disagree on who should be allowed to visit the patient, the
hospital must defer to the decisions of the patient’s representative. As the individual responsible for
making decisions on the patient’s behalf, the patient’s representative has the authority to exercise a
patient’s right to designate and deny visitors just as the patient would if he or she were capable of doing
so. The designation of, and exercise of authority by, the patient’s representative is governed by State
law, including statutory and case law. Many State courts have addressed the concept of substituted
judgment, whereby the patient’s representative is expected to make medical decisions based on the
patient’s values and interests, rather than the representative’s own values and interests. State courts
have also developed a body of closely related law around the matter of a representative acting in the
patient’s best interest. Such case law regarding substituted judgment and best interest may be a resource
for hospitals on how to address such conflict situations as they establish visitation policies and
procedures. Hospitals may also choose to utilize their own social work and pastoral counseling
resources to resolve such conflicts to assure the patient’s well-being.
The required visitation rights notice must address any clinically necessary or reasonable limitations or
restrictions imposed by hospital policy on visitation rights, providing the clinical reasons for such
limitations/restrictions, including how they are aimed at protecting the health and safety of all patients.
The information must be sufficiently detailed to allow a patient (or the patient’s support person) to
determine what the visitation hours are and what restrictions, if any, apply to that patient’s visitation
rights.
The notice must also inform the patient (or the patient’s support person, where appropriate) of the
patient’s right to:
• Consent to receive visitors he or she has designated, either orally or in writing, including but not
limited to, a spouse, a domestic partner (including a same-sex domestic partner), another family
member, or a friend;
• Receive the visitors he or she has designated, including but not limited to, a spouse, a domestic
partner (including a same-sex domestic partner), another family member, or a friend; and
• Withdraw or deny his/her consent to receive specific visitors, either orally or in writing.
The medical record must contain documentation that the required notice was provided to the patient or,
if appropriate, the patient’s support person.
Survey Procedures §482.13(h)(1)&(2)
• Determine whether the hospital’s visitation policies and procedures require providing notice of
the patient’s visitation rights to each patient or, if appropriate, to a patient’s support person
and/or, as applicable, the patient’s representative.
• Review the hospital’s standard notice of visitation rights. Does it clearly explain the:
• hospital’s visitation policy, including any limitations or restrictions, such as visiting
hours, numbers of visitors, unit-specific restrictions, etc., and the clinical rationale for
such limitations or restrictions?
• right of the patient to have designated visitors, including but not limited to, a spouse, a
domestic partner (including a same-sex domestic partner), another family member, or a
friend, and the right to withdraw or deny consent to visitation?
• Review a sample of medical records to determine if there is documentation that the required
notice was provided.
• Ask the hospital to identify how the required notice is provided. Ask staff responsible for
providing the notice how they accomplish this. Ask the staff if they are familiar with the concept
of a patient’s “support person” and what it means.
• Ask a sample of current hospital patients or patients’ support persons (where appropriate)
whether they were provided notice of their right to have visitors. Ask if they were able to have
visitors when they wanted to. If not, verify whether the restriction/limitation on visitors was
addressed in the hospital’s visitation policies and notice, and does not violate the regulations at
§482.13(h)(3)&(4). (See interpretive guidelines for the latter provisions.)
• Ask a sample of current hospital patients or patients’ support persons (where appropriate)
whether the hospital did not limit some or all visitors, contrary to the patient’s wishes.
History
Rev. 75, Issued: 12-02-11, Effective: 12-02-11, Implementation: 12-02-11
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
5f9bfb1b5ba21732556fe30146ff4282f84bb52e9e58fbe7f9190540e0cb4c1b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.