US · guidance
CMS SOM App. A, Tag A-0186
[When restraint or seclusion is used, there must be documentation in the patient's medical record
of the following:]
§482.13(e)(16)(iii) - Alternatives or other less restrictive interventions attempted (as applicable).
Interpretive Guidelines §482.13(e)(16)(iii)
The use of restraint or seclusion must be selected only when less restrictive measures have been judged
to be ineffective to protect the patient or others from harm. It is not always appropriate for less
restrictive alternatives to be attempted prior to the use of restraint or seclusion. When a patient’s
behavior presents an immediate and serious danger to his- or herself, or others, immediate action is
needed. For example, when a patient physically attacks someone, immediate action is needed. While
staff should be mindful of using the least intrusive intervention, it is critical that the intervention selected
be effective in protecting the patient or others from harm.
Survey Procedures §482.13(e)(16)(iii
):
• Does the patient’s medical record document any alternatives or less restrictive interventions
attempted by staff, if appropriate?
• What was the effect of less restrictive interventions, if attempted by staff?
• Were the interventions selected appropriate to the targeted patient behaviors?
• When an immediate and serious danger to the patient or others occurred, was the more restrictive
intervention(s) effective? Could a less restrictive intervention have been used to ensure the
safety of the patient, staff or others?
History
Rev. 37, Issued: 10-17-08; Effective/Implementation Date: 10-17-08
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
3dcd85dc05cd5404addb994446639c39a5dfdd60e296cd69e15da3230ce59055
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.