Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS SOM App. A, Tag A-0183

§482.13(e)(15) - All requirements specified under this paragraph are applicable to the

activein force · 2026-07-22 – presentas-observed

simultaneous use of restraint and seclusion. Simultaneous restraint and seclusion use is only

permitted if the patient is continually monitored –

(i) Face-to-face by an assigned, trained staff member; or

(ii) By trained staff using both video and audio equipment. This monitoring must be in

close proximity to the patient.

Interpretive Guidelines §482.13(e)(15)

When the simultaneous use of restraint and seclusion is employed, there must be adequate

documentation that justifies the decision for simultaneous use as well as vigilance in continuously

monitoring the patient so that the patient’s care needs are met.

All requirements specified under standard (e) apply to the simultaneous use of restraint and seclusion.

The simultaneous use of restraint and seclusion is not permitted unless the patient is continually

monitored by trained staff, either through face-to-face observation or through the use of both video and

audio equipment. Monitoring with video and audio equipment further requires that staff perform the

monitoring in close proximity to the patient. For the purposes of this requirement, “continually” means

ongoing without interruption. The use of video and audio equipment does not eliminate the need for

frequent monitoring and assessment of the patient.

An individual who is physically restrained alone in his or her room is not necessarily being

simultaneously secluded. The individual’s privacy and dignity should be protected to the extent possible

during any intervention. In fact, the purpose of restraining a patient alone in his or her room may be to

promote privacy and dignity versus simultaneously using seclusion and restraint. While this distinction

may be difficult to make, it is helpful to consider whether the patient would, in the absence of the

physical restraint, be able to voluntarily leave the room. If so, then the patient is not also being

secluded. However, if the physical restraint was removed and the patient was still unable to leave the

room because the door was locked or staff were otherwise physically preventing the patient from doing

so, then the patient is also being secluded.

Staff must take extra care to protect the safety of the patient when interventions that are more restrictive

are used. Monitoring must be appropriate to the intervention chosen, so that the patient is protected

from possible abuse, assault, or self injury during the intervention.

Survey Procedures §482.13(e)(15):

• Review the hospital’s policy regarding simultaneous use of restraint and seclusion to determine

whether it provides for continual monitoring and otherwise complies with all requirements of

§482.13.

• Conduct document review and staff interviews to determine if practice is consistent with the

hospital policy and required uninterrupted audio and visual monitoring is provided as required.

• Is the staff member monitoring the patient with video and audio equipment trained and in close

proximity to ensure prompt emergency intervention if a problem arises?

• Does the video equipment cover all areas of the room or location where the patient is restrained

or secluded?

• Is the audio and video equipment located in an area that assures patient privacy?

• Is the equipment appropriately maintained and in working condition?

History

Rev. 37, Issued: 10-17-08; Effective/Implementation Date: 10-17-08

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-07-22
Edition
som-2026-07-22
Content hash
8ca9424d4612f27f99d1862cb624f0cd73f06c272dbdae6b5360f65374522bcc
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.