US · guidance
CMS SOM App. A, Tag A-0183
§482.13(e)(15) - All requirements specified under this paragraph are applicable to the
simultaneous use of restraint and seclusion. Simultaneous restraint and seclusion use is only
permitted if the patient is continually monitored –
(i) Face-to-face by an assigned, trained staff member; or
(ii) By trained staff using both video and audio equipment. This monitoring must be in
close proximity to the patient.
Interpretive Guidelines §482.13(e)(15)
When the simultaneous use of restraint and seclusion is employed, there must be adequate
documentation that justifies the decision for simultaneous use as well as vigilance in continuously
monitoring the patient so that the patient’s care needs are met.
All requirements specified under standard (e) apply to the simultaneous use of restraint and seclusion.
The simultaneous use of restraint and seclusion is not permitted unless the patient is continually
monitored by trained staff, either through face-to-face observation or through the use of both video and
audio equipment. Monitoring with video and audio equipment further requires that staff perform the
monitoring in close proximity to the patient. For the purposes of this requirement, “continually” means
ongoing without interruption. The use of video and audio equipment does not eliminate the need for
frequent monitoring and assessment of the patient.
An individual who is physically restrained alone in his or her room is not necessarily being
simultaneously secluded. The individual’s privacy and dignity should be protected to the extent possible
during any intervention. In fact, the purpose of restraining a patient alone in his or her room may be to
promote privacy and dignity versus simultaneously using seclusion and restraint. While this distinction
may be difficult to make, it is helpful to consider whether the patient would, in the absence of the
physical restraint, be able to voluntarily leave the room. If so, then the patient is not also being
secluded. However, if the physical restraint was removed and the patient was still unable to leave the
room because the door was locked or staff were otherwise physically preventing the patient from doing
so, then the patient is also being secluded.
Staff must take extra care to protect the safety of the patient when interventions that are more restrictive
are used. Monitoring must be appropriate to the intervention chosen, so that the patient is protected
from possible abuse, assault, or self injury during the intervention.
Survey Procedures §482.13(e)(15):
• Review the hospital’s policy regarding simultaneous use of restraint and seclusion to determine
whether it provides for continual monitoring and otherwise complies with all requirements of
§482.13.
• Conduct document review and staff interviews to determine if practice is consistent with the
hospital policy and required uninterrupted audio and visual monitoring is provided as required.
• Is the staff member monitoring the patient with video and audio equipment trained and in close
proximity to ensure prompt emergency intervention if a problem arises?
• Does the video equipment cover all areas of the room or location where the patient is restrained
or secluded?
• Is the audio and video equipment located in an area that assures patient privacy?
• Is the equipment appropriately maintained and in working condition?
History
Rev. 37, Issued: 10-17-08; Effective/Implementation Date: 10-17-08
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
8ca9424d4612f27f99d1862cb624f0cd73f06c272dbdae6b5360f65374522bcc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.