Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS SOM App. A, Tag A-0172

[Unless superseded by State law that is more restrictive --]

activein force · 2026-07-22 – presentas-observed

§482.13(e)(8)(ii) - After 24 hours, before writing a new order for the use of restraint or seclusion

for the management of violent or self-destructive behavior, a physician or other licensed

practitioner who is responsible for the care of the patient and authorized to order restraint or

seclusion by hospital policy in accordance with State law must see and assess the patient..

Interpretive Guidelines §482.13(e)(8)(ii)

At a minimum, if a patient remains in restraint or seclusion for the management of violent or self-destructive behavior 24 hours after the original order, the physician or other LP must see the patient and

conduct a face-to-face re-evaluation before writing a new order for the continued use of restraint or

seclusion. Twenty-four hours of restraint or seclusion for the management of violent or self-destructive

behavior is an extreme measure with the potential for serious harm to the patient.

State laws may be more restrictive and require the physician or other LP to conduct a face-to-face re-evaluation within a shorter timeframe.

When the physician or other LP renews an order or writes a new order authorizing the continued use of

restraint or seclusion, there must be documentation in the patient’s medical record that describes the

findings of the physician's or other LPs re-evaluation supporting the continued use of restraint or

seclusion.

EXCEPTION: Repetitive self-mutilating behaviors – see interpretive guidance for §482.13(e)(6).

Survey Procedures §482.13(e)(8)((ii)

• If restraint or seclusion is used to manage violent or self-destructive behavior for longer than 24

hours, is there documentation of a new written order, patient assessments, and a re-evaluation by

a physician or other LP in the medical record? Does the documentation provide sufficient

evidence to support the need to continue the use of restraint or seclusion? Is there evidence in

the medical record that the symptoms necessitating the continued use of restraint or seclusion

have persisted?

• Does the patient’s plan of care or treatment plan address the use of restraint or seclusion?

• What is the patient’s documented clinical response to the continued need for restraint and

seclusion?

History

Rev. 200, Issued: 02-21-20; Effective: 02-21-20, Implementation: 02-21-20

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-07-22
Edition
som-2026-07-22
Content hash
ff38cd98964a5f64456d66c935e6c15a661244e21772c1379d6571a858667fc8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.