Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS SOM App. A, Tag A-0168

§482.13(e)(5) - The use of restraint or seclusion must be in accordance with the order of a

activein force · 2026-07-22 – presentas-observed

physician or other licensed practitioner who is responsible for the care of the patient and

authorized to order restraint or seclusion by hospital policy in accordance with State law.

Interpretive Guidelines §482.13(e)(5)

Hospitals must have policies and procedures for the initiation of restraint or seclusion that identify the

categories of licensed practitioners (LPs) that are permitted to order restraint or seclusion in that

hospital, consistent with State law.

The regulation requires that a physician or other LP responsible for the care of the patient to order

restraint or seclusion prior to the application of restraint or seclusion. In some situations, however, the

need for a restraint or seclusion intervention may occur so quickly that an order cannot be obtained prior

to the application of restraint or seclusion. In these emergency application situations, the order must

be obtained either during the emergency application of the restraint or seclusion, or immediately (within

a few minutes) after the restraint or seclusion has been applied. The failure to immediately obtain an

order is viewed as the application of restraint or seclusion without an order. The hospital should address

this process in its restraint and seclusion policies and procedures. The policies and procedures should

specify who can initiate the emergency application of restraint or seclusion prior to obtaining an order

from a physician or other LP.

Licensed Practitioner (LP)

For the purpose of ordering restraint or seclusion, an LP is any practitioner permitted by State law and

hospital policy as having the authority to order restraints or seclusion for patients.

A resident who is authorized by State law and the hospital’s residency program to practice as a

physician can carry out functions reserved for a physician or LP by the regulation. A medical school

student holds no license, and his/her work is reviewed and must be countersigned by the attending

physician; therefore, he or she is not licensed or independent. A medical school student is not a LP.

Protocols

A protocol cannot serve as a substitute for obtaining a physician's or other LP’s order prior to initiating

each episode of restraint or seclusion use. If a hospital uses protocols that include the use of restraint or

seclusion, a specific physician or LP order is still required for each episode of restraint or seclusion use.

The philosophy that serves as a foundation for the regulation is that restraint or seclusion use is an

exceptional event, not a routine response to a certain patient condition or behavior. Each patient must be

assessed, and interventions should be tailored to meet the individual patient’s needs. The creation of a

protocol can run counter to this philosophy if it sets up the expectation that restraint or seclusion will be

used as a routine part of care. The use of restraint or seclusion is a last resort when less restrictive

measures have been determined ineffective to ensure the safety of the patient, staff or others, should not

be a standard response to a behavior or patient need.

Survey Procedures §482.13(e)(5)

• Review hospital policies and medical staff by-laws to ascertain clinical practice guidelines that

describe the responsibilities of medical staff and clinicians who are privileged to order restraint

and seclusion.

• Do the hospital’s written policies identify what categories of practitioners the State recognizes as

an LP or as having the authority to order restraint and seclusion?

• Does the hospital have written policies indicating which practitioners are permitted to order

restraint or seclusion in the facility?

• Do the hospital’s written policies conform to State law?

• Does the hospital have established policies for who can initiate restraint or seclusion?

• Does the hospital utilize protocols for the use of restraint or seclusion? If so, is the use of

protocols consistent with the requirements of the regulation?

• Do the medical records reviewed identify the physician or LP who ordered each use of restraint

or seclusion?

• During the medical record review, verify that a physician or LP order was obtained prior to the

initiation of restraint or seclusion. When emergency application of restraint or seclusion was

necessary, verify that a physician or LP order was obtained immediately (within a few minutes)

after application of the restraint or seclusion.

History

Rev. 200, Issued: 02-21-20; Effective: 02-21-20, Implementation: 02-21-20

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-07-22
Edition
som-2026-07-22
Content hash
448fa4d6e458d5e8f72fdf637cc3dd6d1ccc87f417a0b3fb70f7a8372dd069b6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.