US · guidance
CMS SOM App. A, Tag A-0144
§482.13(c)(2) - The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting
Interpretive Guidelines §482.13(c)(2)
The intention of this requirement is to specify that each patient receives care in an environment that a
reasonable person,
similarly situated as the patient would consider to be safe. For example, hospital staff
should follow current standards of practice for patient environmental safety, infection control, and
security. The hospital must protect vulnerable patients, including newborns, children and the elderly.
Additionally, this standard is intended to provide protection for the patient’s emotional health and safety
as well as his/her physical safety. Respect, dignity, and comfort are also components of an emotionally
safe environment. To provide care in a safe setting, hospitals should also identify patients at risk for
intentional harm to self or others, identify environmental safety risks for such patients, and provide
environmental safety education and training for staff and volunteers.
Patients at risk of suicide (or other forms of self-harm), or who exhibit violent behaviors toward others,
receive healthcare services in both inpatient and outpatient locations of hospitals. Although all risks cannot
be eliminated, hospitals should be able to demonstrate how they identify patients at risk of self-harm or harm
to others and the steps they are taking to minimize those risks in accordance with nationally recognized
standards and guidelines. The potential risks include, but are not limited to, those from ligatures, sharps,
harmful substances, access to medications, breakable windows, accessible light fixtures, plastic bags (for
suffocation), oxygen tubing, bell cords, etc.
Hospitals should consider three main elements in ensuring patient safety related to ligature risks:
1. Patient Assessment
There are numerous models and versions of patient screening and assessment tools to identify
the risk of harm to self or others. CMS does not endorse nor require the use of any particular
tool. The type of patient screening or assessment tool used to determine the risk of harm to self
or others should be appropriate to the patient population served, care setting, and staff
competency. Hospitals should implement a patient screening and risk assessment strategy that is
appropriate to the patient population. For example, a patient screening and risk assessment
strategy in a post-partum unit would most likely not be the same screening and risk assessment
strategy utilized in the emergency department.
All patients in psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric units should be screened for suicidal
ideation in order to ensure patient safety. In acute care hospitals, patients being evaluated and
treated for behavioral health conditions as their primary reason for care should be screened for
suicidal ideation. Hospital policy should address any other circumstances where suicidal
screening is required.
Hospitals may find the recommendations and resources in the 2018 report, Recommended
standard care for people with suicide risk: Making health care suicide safe, issued by the
National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention (Action Alliance), to be highly useful in
developing the best practices for effective patient screening and assessment for those patients at
risk for harm to themselves, as well as for improving the care of patients at risk of suicide.
1
The
Action Alliance is a public-private partnership working to advance
1
National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention: Transforming Health Systems Initiative
Work Group. (2018). Recommended standard care for people with suicide risk: Making
health care suicide safe. Washington, DC:
the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention and reduce the suicide rate by twenty percent by
2025. Notably, the report advances two of the goals of the National Strategy for Suicide
Prevention (National Strategy): (a) Promote suicide prevention as a core component of health
care services, and (b) Promote and implement effective clinical and professional practices for
assessing and treating those identified as being at risk for suicidal behaviors. (To download a
copy of the National Strategy, please visit: www.actionallianceforsuicideprevention.org).
2.Staffing/Monitoring
Hospitals should also provide the appropriate level of education and training to staff regarding
the identification of patients at risk of harm to themselves or others, the identification of
environmental patient safety risk factors, and mitigation strategies. Staff would include direct
employees, volunteers, contractors, per diem staff, and any other individuals providing clinical
care under arrangement. Hospitals have the flexibility to tailor the training to the services staff
provide and the patient populations they serve. CMS expects hospitals to provide education and
training to all new staff initially upon orientation and whenever policies and procedures
change. Additionally, CMS recommends ongoing training at least every two years after initial
training.
3.Environmental Risk
Just as all hospitals should implement a patient risk assessment strategy to ensure patient safety,
all hospitals should implement an environmental risk assessment strategy to provide patient care
in a safe setting. Environmental risk assessment strategies may not be the same in all hospitals or
hospital units. The hospital should implement environmental risk assessment strategies
appropriate to the specific care environment and patient population. Risk assessments should be
appropriate to each unit and should consider the possibility that the unit may sometimes care for
patients at risk for the threat of harm to self or others.
Survey Procedures §482.13(c)(2)
• Review and analyze patient and staff incident and accident reports to identify any incidents or
patterns of incidents concerning a safe environment. Expand your review if you suspect more
widespread or pervasive problems with safe environment issues in the hospital.
• Observe patient care environments and other areas frequented by patients for unattended items
such as utility or housekeeping carts that contain hazardous items that may pose a safety risk to
patients, visitors and staff. Examples of these items could include cleaning agents, disinfectant
solutions, mops, brooms, tools, etc
.
• Review policy and procedures and interview staff in patient care areas to determine how the
hospital trains staff on assessment of the patient care environment upon hire, before
providing patient care or working independently, and whenever policies and procedures are
revised or updated.
• Review policy and procedures and interview staff to identify processes to keep staff members
current on meeting the needs of the patient population served, to identify risks in the care
environment, and if risk is found, how staff report those findings.
• Review policy and procedures and interview staff to determine how the hospital defines
continuous visual observation or 1:1 monitoring in which a staff member is assigned to
observe only one patient at all times. The policy should include the ability of the assigned
staff member to immediately intervene when patient safety may be at risk.
• Observe and interview staff at units where infants and children are inpatients. Are appropriate
security protections (such as alarms, arm banding systems, etc.) in place? Are they functioning?
• Review policy and procedures on what the hospital does to curtail unwanted visitors,
contaminated materials, or unsafe items that pose a safety risk to patients and staff.
• Access the hospital’s security efforts to protect vulnerable patients including newborns, children,
the elderly, and patients at risk of suicide or intentional harm to self or others. Is the hospital
providing appropriate security to protect patients? Are appropriate security mechanisms in place
and being followed to protect patients? Security mechanisms should be based on nationally
recognized standards of practice.
• Determine if the hospital has a policy for assessing and reassessing patients who have been
identified as being at risk for suicide or harm to self or others, according to nationally accepted
standards of practice. Review policies and interview staff to verify processes are established to
protect these vulnerable patients and ensure care is provided in a safe setting.
History
Rev. 238; Issued: 03-20-26; Effective: 09-05-25; Implantation: 09-05-25
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
1a44d88d1447714e150f5f270641dabfeba5b843d72cc99a71243b7efcc04c71
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.