US · guidance
Notice 2026-28, 2026-34 I.R.B. 177
Guidance on the employer credit for paid family and medical leave under section 45S
I. PURPOSE
This notice provides guidance on the employer credit for paid family and medical leave under section 45S of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended by section 70304 of Pub. L. 119-21, 139 Stat. 72 (July 4, 2025), commonly known as the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). The Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) intend to publish proposed regulations under section 45S that include the guidance contained in this notice (forthcoming proposed regulations).
II. BACKGROUND
Section 45S was added to the Code by section 13403 of Pub. L. 115-97, 131 Stat. 2504 (December 22, 2017), commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) as a temporary provision applicable to wages paid in taxable years beginning on or before December 31, 2019. The termination date set forth in section 45S(i) by the TCJA was extended by the “Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020,” Pub. L. 116-94, 133 Stat. 2534, enacted on December 20, 2019, and by the “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021,” Pub. L. 116-260, 134 Stat. 1182 (December 27, 2020). The OBBBA amended various provisions of section 45S and made section 45S permanent.
Section 45S establishes the paid family and medical leave credit for employers that provide paid family and medical leave (the credit).1 For purposes of the paid family and medical leave credit, section 45S(d) defines an employee by cross-reference to section 3(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which generally defines employee as any individual employed by an employer. Under section 45S(g), wages qualifying for the credit are wages subject to the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) pursuant to section 3306(b), determined without regard to the $7,000 FUTA wage limitation.
Section 70304(a)(1)(A) of the OBBBA amended section 45S(a)(1) by setting forth an additional method for calculating the credit. As amended, section 45S(a)(1) provides that the employer may elect to determine the amount of the credit based on either the wages actually paid to qualifying employees while they are on family and medical leave (the wage method), or, if the employer maintains an insurance policy with regard to the provision of paid family and medical leave during the taxable year, the premiums paid or incurred by the employer with respect to that insurance policy during the taxable year (the premium method). Section 70304(a)(1)(B) of the OBBBA added section 45S(a)(3) to the Code to provide that the determination of the rate of payment under the premium method is made without regard to whether any qualifying employees were on family and medical leave during the taxable year.
Section 45S(c)(3) previously provided that all persons treated as a single employer under section 52(a) or (b) should be treated as a single taxpayer. Section 70304(a)(3) of the OBBBA amended the aggregation rule in section 45S(c)(3) to provide generally that all persons treated as a single employer under section 414(b) and (c) are treated as a single employer, and to provide an exception to the application of the aggregation rule for any person who establishes to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the person has a substantial and legitimate business reason for failing to provide a written policy that satisfies the requirements of section 45S(c)(1) or (c)(2).
Section 70304(a)(3) of the OBBBA also amended section 45S(c)(4) by modifying the treatment of leave required by state or local law or paid for by state or local governments so that such leave is taken into account for purposes of determining the amount of paid family and medical leave provided by the employer for purposes of determining whether the employer is an “eligible employer” that may claim the credit. However, such leave continues not to be taken into account for purposes of calculating the amount of the credit under section 45S(a).
Section 70304(a)(4) of the OBBBA amended section 45S(d) by modifying the definition of qualifying employee to limit that definition to employees customarily employed for not less than 20 hours per week and to permit an employer to elect to include employees after a six-month period (rather than a one-year period) of employment.
The OBBBA also amended section 280C(a) to provide that no deduction shall be allowed for that portion of the premiums paid or incurred for the taxable year which is equal to that portion of the paid family and medical leave credit which is determined for the taxable year under section 45S(a)(1)(B).2
The Treasury Department and the IRS issued guidance regarding section 45S in Notice 2018-71, 2018-41 IRB 548.
III. GUIDANCE
This notice modifies Notice 2018-71 to provide guidance regarding the premium method. The Treasury Department and the IRS anticipate that the forthcoming proposed regulations will be consistent with the guidance in this section III.
A. Premium Method
Q-1. To determine whether an employer is eligible to claim the credit, and to calculate the amount of the credit, how do the criteria under the premium method compare to the criteria under the wage method?
A-1. The determination of whether an employer is eligible to claim the credit and the amount of the credit under the premium method is based on whether and the extent to which the premium funds a benefit for which a credit would be available under the wage method. Thus, a credit may be claimed for a premium that funds a benefit for which a credit would be available under the wage method if the benefit were paid (creditable coverage). If any portion of the premium provides funding for leave that would not be eligible for credit under the wage method, that portion of the premium is not eligible for credit under the premium method.
Q-2. Is a premium (or portion thereof) paid or incurred (as defined in section 7701(a)(25)) for creditable coverage if it is for coverage with respect to leave that would not be paid family or medical leave as defined in section 45S(e)?
A-2. No. A premium (or portion thereof) is not paid or incurred for creditable coverage if it is for coverage with respect to leave that would not be paid family or medical leave as defined in section 45S(e).
Q-3. Is a premium (or portion thereof) paid or incurred for creditable coverage if it is for coverage with respect to leave that would be payable to an individual who is not a qualifying employee within the meaning of section 45S(d) at the time the premium is paid or incurred?
A-3. No. A premium (or portion thereof) is not paid or incurred for creditable coverage if it is for coverage with respect to leave that would be payable to an individual who is not a qualifying employee within the meaning of section 45S(d) at the time the premium is paid or incurred.
Q-4. Is a premium (or portion thereof) paid or incurred for creditable coverage if it is for coverage with respect to leave that is required by state or local law or paid for by a state or local government?
A-4. No. A premium (or portion thereof) is not paid or incurred for creditable coverage if it is for coverage with respect to leave that is required by state or local law or paid for by a state or local government.
Q-5. Is a premium (or portion thereof) paid or incurred for creditable coverage if it is for coverage that provides a benefit that would not constitute wages as defined in section 45S(g)?
A-5. No. A premium (or portion thereof) is not paid or incurred for creditable coverage if it is for coverage that provides a benefit that would not constitute wages as defined in section 45S(g). For an example of compensation that does not constitute wages as defined in section 45S(g), see Q&A-24, Example 2 of Notice 2018-71.
B. Allocation of Qualifying Premium
Q-6. How does an employer determine the amount of premiums that are paid or incurred for creditable coverage for purposes of the premium method if the premiums are for an insurance policy that provides both creditable coverage and noncreditable coverage?
A-6. In the case of a premium paid or incurred for an insurance policy that provides both creditable coverage and noncreditable coverage (a blended premium), an eligible employer must allocate the premium between the creditable coverage and the noncreditable coverage. A premium is a blended premium if, for example, it is for coverage that provides both qualifying paid family and medical leave and other types of leave, or coverage for qualifying employees and nonqualifying employees. A blended premium may be allocated using any reasonable method that is consistent with the policy terms and supported by contemporaneous records. To be reasonable, a method must include objective criteria and must be applied consistently for the taxable year and to all persons treated as a single employer under the aggregation rule in section 45S(c)(3).
C. Electing Between Premium Method and Wage Method
Q-7. May an employer claim the credit using both the wage method with respect to certain leave, and the premium method with respect to other leave?
A-7. Yes, provided that both the premium and the wage credit are not claimed as to a particular instance of leave. An employer may claim the credit using the wage method for certain leave, and the premium method for other leave. However, an employer may not use the wage method to claim a credit for wages paid to the extent that the employer claims a credit using the premium method for creditable coverage that funds such benefits (or vice versa). For example, if an employer pays a premium for creditable coverage and claims a credit for that premium, the employer may not also claim the credit for benefits later funded by that same premium (via reimbursement or otherwise). In contrast, if the benefits paid during that instance of leave are partially funded by the premium and partially funded from the employer’s general assets, the wage credit may be claimed for the portion funded from the employer’s general assets and the premium credit may be claimed for the portion funded by the premium.
IV. FORTHCOMING PROPOSED REGULATIONS
It is anticipated that the forthcoming proposed regulations will be consistent with the guidance contained in this notice and will also address other issues. It is further anticipated that the forthcoming proposed regulations, when finalized, would apply prospectively to wages and insurance premiums paid or incurred after issuance of the final regulations. Taxpayers may rely on the guidance contained in this notice for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, and before the issuance of the proposed regulations.
V. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
This notice generally provides guidance that the Treasury Department and the IRS intend to incorporate into proposed regulations. The proposed regulations will provide interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the issues addressed in the proposed regulations. However, to assist in development of the proposed regulations, the Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all aspects of this notice and any other issues regarding implementation of the amendments to section 45S by the OBBBA. Specifically, the Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on the following:
The factors that may be used to allocate a blended premium. Comments are also requested on how employers may support and substantiate allocation determinations.
The application of section 45S(a)(1)(B) and section 45S(c)(4) to premiums paid or incurred by an employer for paid family and medical leave through a voluntary paid family and medical leave program facilitated by a state and administered by a private insurance company.
What constitutes a substantial and legitimate business reason under section 45S(c)(3) for failure to provide a written policy described in section 45S(c)(1) or (2).
Written comments should be submitted on or before October 16, 2026. Consideration will be given, however, to any written comment submitted after that date, if such consideration will not delay the issuance of the proposed regulations. The subject line for the comments should include a reference to Notice 2026-28. Comments may be submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (type IRS-2026-0496 in the search field on the regulations.gov homepage to find this notice and submit comments). Alternatively, comments may be submitted by mail to: Internal Revenue Service, CC:PA:01:PR (Notice 2026-28), Room 5503, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. All commenters are strongly encouraged to submit comments electronically. The Treasury Department and the IRS will publish for public availability any comment submitted electronically, or on paper, to the IRS’s public docket on https://www.regulations.gov.
VI. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
Section D of Notice 2018-71 is modified to provide guidance regarding the premium method.
VII. DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this notice is Christopher Dellana of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and Employment Taxes), though other Treasury Department and IRS officials participated in its development. For further information regarding this notice contact Mr. Dellana at (202) 317-5500 (not a toll-free call).
History
Notice published in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2026-34, August 17, 2026, at page 177. It states no effective date of its own; this row opens at the bulletin's publication date. Effect on other documents, as printed: "Section D of Notice 2018-71 is modified to provide guidance regarding the premium method."
Provenance
- Source
- irs.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- irs-irb-2026-09-20
- Content hash
d993f7d77fe06faca144a4294cbf3a45359dc2c7474d42a3befb0a0e50a0d51f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.