US · guidance
Notice 2024-71, 2024-44 I.R.B. 1026
Expenses Treated as Amounts Paid for Medical Care
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This notice provides a safe harbor under section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code for amounts paid for condoms.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
Section 213 allows an individual taxpayer an itemized deduction for expenses paid during the taxable year, not compensated for by insurance or otherwise, for medical care of the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse, or the taxpayer’s dependent, to the extent that such expenses exceed 7.5 percent of the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income. Section 213(d) provides, in relevant part, that the term “medical care” means amounts paid for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or for the purpose of affecting any structure or function of the body. Section 1.213-1(e)(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that deductions for medical care expenses under section 213 are limited to expenses “incurred primarily for the prevention or alleviation of a physical or mental defect or illness” and do not include deductions for expenses that are merely beneficial to an individual’s general health.
Amounts treated as expenses for medical care under section 213(d) are eligible to be paid or reimbursed under a health flexible spending arrangement (health FSA), Archer medical savings account (Archer MSA), health reimbursement arrangement (HRA), or health savings account (HSA). However, if an amount is paid or reimbursed under a health FSA, Archer MSA, HRA, HSA, or any other health plan or otherwise, it is not a deductible expense under section 213.
The determination of whether an expense is incurred for the prevention of disease, or other form of medical care under section 213(d), depends upon the facts and circumstances. Stringham v. Commissioner, 12 T.C. 580, 584 (1949). Thus, depending on the specific facts and circumstances, amounts paid for condoms may or may not be considered medical expenses under section 213(d).
SECTION 3. SAFE HARBOR
The Treasury Department and the IRS will treat amounts paid for condoms as amounts paid for medical care under section 213(d).
SECTION 4. APPLICATION OF SAFE HARBOR
Because amounts paid for condoms are treated as expenses for medical care under section 213(d), if the other requirements of section 213(a) are met (for example, if a taxpayer’s total medical expenses exceed the 7.5-percent adjusted gross income limitation and are not compensated for by insurance or otherwise), then amounts paid by the taxpayer for condoms for the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse, or the taxpayer’s dependent are deductible as expenses for medical care under section 213. Additionally, because amounts paid for condoms are treated as expenses for medical care under section 213(d), the amounts are also eligible to be paid or reimbursed under a health FSA, Archer MSA, HRA, or HSA. However, if an amount paid for condoms is paid or reimbursed under a health FSA, Archer MSA, HRA, HSA, or any other health plan or otherwise, it is not a deductible expense under section 213.
SECTION 5. DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal authors of this notice are Elizabeth Choi and Amy S. Wei of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting). However, additional personnel in the Office of Chief Counsel and at the Treasury Department participated in the development of this notice. For additional information, contact Branch 3 of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting) at (202) 317-5100 (not a toll-free number).
History
Notice published in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2024-44, October 28, 2024, at page 1026. It states no effective date of its own; this row opens at the bulletin's publication date.
Provenance
- Source
- irs.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- irs-irb-2026-09-20
- Content hash
7526767484ae5f3c97a3c786daf8726ce72a4175f4c188fcf0eb81a6e07798fc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.