Bindinglaw

US · guidance

Justice Manual § 9-50.300

Application of Resources

activein force · 2023-08-01 – presentas-observed

Although all USAOs are generally expected to devote resources to CHIP program objectives, those districts that have received FTE funding for the CHIP program should utilize those resources consistent with the program objectives described above. The creation of “Intellectual Property” and “Computer Crime” case categories in Form USA-5 and CaseView should enable USAOs to accurately record program work and it is critical that all prosecutors accurately enter that time so that DOJ can track resources on Intellectual Property and Computer Crimes. In addition, the use of performance work elements that reflect non-case related work, such as outreach and training, should encourage such work by CHIP AUSAs and provide an opportunity for them to track and quantify the work not otherwise reflected in case statistics.

The proper application of dedicated CHIP resources will be the subject of review by EOUSA’s Evaluation and Review Staff (EARS). In addition, the annual collection of intellectual property prosecution statistics is required by statute, and those statistics will be reviewed along with EARS reports and other available information by the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, in order to determine whether dedicated FTE resources are being effectively used and appropriately allocated.

History

[updated August 2023]

Provenance

Source
justice.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-20
Edition
jm-2026-09-20
Content hash
1856a4117f9779a013f7f9711df061f2fada9c337e4c086d008d5cad8bf2032e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Justice Manual § 9-50.300 — Application of Resources · binding.law