Bindinglaw

US · guidance

Justice Manual § 9-44.203

Factors to Consider Prior to Issuance of Authorized Investigative Demands

activein force · 2026-09-20 – presentas-observed

The following factors should be considered prior to the issuance of an authorized investigative demand:

Whether the background of the criminal investigation for which the records are being subpoenaed relates to any act or activity involving a Federal health care offense (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 24(a)) as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3486.

Whether appropriate consideration has been given to the manner in which to enforce the investigative demand in the event of noncompliance.

Provenance

Source
justice.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-20
Edition
jm-2026-09-20
Content hash
3fa2961e488222ea2d0adaac2161207ebacbbcc3e111f095de1087eb25f50cff
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.