US · guidance
Justice Manual § 9-2.040
Dismissal of Complaints
The United States Attorney may dismiss a criminal complaint without prior authorization from the Criminal Division except in the instances enumerated in JM 9-2.145. However, Rule 48(a), Fed. R. Crim. P., requires leave of court for dismissal of a complaint, as discussed infra. See also JM 9-27.000 (Principles of Federal Prosecution).
If the person charged in a complaint has been bound over for grand jury action, the complaint may be dismissed by the United States Attorney only by leave of court. A court may confer on the United States attorney a blanket authorization to dismiss complaints. If such authorization has not been given, leave of court to dismiss the complaint must be obtained in each particular case.
Whether leave of court is required to dismiss a complaint prior to the defendant being bound over for grand jury action has not been judicially settled. The United States Attorney must be governed by the interpretation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 48(a) given by the court in his district. The view that leave of court is not required to dismiss a complaint prior to the person charged being bound over is supported by the control over complaints given to judicial officers in Rules 4 and 5, Fed. R. Crim. P. Under those rules, a judicial officer may issue a warrant, may discharge a defendant, and may cancel an unexecuted warrant of arrest. It would seem, therefore, that the judicial officer can exercise a like control over a complaint prior to his decision to bind over the defendant and that leave of the court is not required.
Provenance
- Source
- justice.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- jm-2026-09-20
- Content hash
84891fb3eac84663fda3c68bc303fe33fc29aacbf296124ed67be306f303cef5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.