Bindinglaw

US · guidance

Justice Manual § 9-118.200

Goals

activein force · 2019-02-01 – presentas-observed

The Asset Forfeiture Program (the Program) has four primary goals:

To punish and deter criminal activity by depriving criminals of property used in or acquired through illegal activities.

To promote and enhance cooperation among federal, state, local, tribal, and foreign law enforcement agencies.

To recover assets that may be used to compensate victims when authorized under federal law.

To ensure the Program is administered professionally, lawfully, and in a manner consistent with sound public policy.

To achieve these goals the Department of Justice should use asset forfeiture to the fullest extent possible to investigate, identify, seize, and forfeit the assets of criminals and their organizations while ensuring that due process rights of all property owners are protected. Asset forfeiture plays a critical role in disrupting and dismantling illegal enterprises, depriving criminals of the proceeds of illegal activity, deterring crime, and restoring property to victims.

The effective use of both criminal and civil asset forfeiture is an essential component of the Department of Justice’s efforts to combat the most sophisticated criminal actors and organizations—including terrorist financiers, cyber criminals, fraudsters, human traffickers, and transnational drug cartels.

History

[updated February 2019]

Provenance

Source
justice.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-20
Edition
jm-2026-09-20
Content hash
a70e2daea50a877ba12d75231a13dbae0f6f4c21ce6497e001a2702b125e4c20
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.