Bindinglaw

US · guidance

Justice Manual § 9-113.300

Effecting Settlement Agreements Through Administrative Forfeiture

activein force · 2010-05-01 – presentas-observed

The following procedures apply to settlement agreements in civil judicial forfeiture cases and to criminal forfeiture plea agreements where an administrative forfeiture is necessary to effectuate the agreement. In such cases, the headquarters of the seizing agency involved must be consulted by the United States Attorney's Office prior to finalizing an agreement in order to ensure the agency can accommodate the terms of the agreement. The Department's policy is to pursue an agreed upon administrative forfeiture where it is possible and economically efficient to do so. See Chapter 11 of the Asset Forfeiture Policy Manual ("Using Administrative Forfeiture to Achieve a Settlement").

History

[updated May 2010]

Provenance

Source
justice.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-20
Edition
jm-2026-09-20
Content hash
e9140761df21331253d878eb491e2982619a83ae02da35b0d1a67906cef7127a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Justice Manual § 9-113.300 — Effecting Settlement Agr… · binding.law