Bindinglaw

US · guidance

Justice Manual § 9-113.102

Recovery of Investigative Costs

activein force · 2010-05-01 – presentas-observed

In general, the Government should not attempt to use a settlement to recover the costs of its investigation. It may be appropriate in unusual circumstances, however, to recover extraordinary expenditures, such as funds needed to clean up environmental damage to the forfeited property.

History

[new May 2010]

Provenance

Source
justice.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-20
Edition
jm-2026-09-20
Content hash
3b268bd042bcf3e189bf65147982d301c49711258dd845113bf492904f556767
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Justice Manual § 9-113.102 — Recovery of Investigativ… · binding.law