US · guidance
Justice Manual § 6-5.220
Summons Litigation— Commencement of a Summons Enforcement Proceeding
Summons enforcement proceedings are summary in nature. The Government commences the proceeding when it files a petition, a declaration of the examining/investigating agent, and a proposed order to show cause why the court should not enforce the summons. See Summons Enforcement Manual, https://www.justice.gov/tax/foia-library. IRS counsel usually will prepare and forward the pleadings to the United States Attorney’s Office along with the request for enforcement.
The Government ordinarily relies on the court's Order to Show Cause to compel the summoned person to appear in court for the summons-enforcement hearing. The Government very rarely seeks the arrest of a summoned person under the attachment authority of 26 U.S.C. § 7604(b) to obtain his appearance at the summons-enforcement hearing. The United States Attorney’s Office may not utilize the attachment authority of 26 U.S.C. § 7604(b) unless the Chief of the appropriate Civil Trial Section authorizes this action in writing. An attachment under 26 U.S.C. § 7604(b) should not be confused with the arrest of the summoned person after a judicial finding and order of contempt for failing to comply with a court order enforcing the summons. No prior authorization is needed to seek arrest and confinement pursuant to an order of contempt.
History
[updated February 2018] [cited in JM 6-2.000]
Provenance
- Source
- justice.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- jm-2026-09-20
- Content hash
442e5f90c6cff6864792ae6a3881f7f427228b4c95cc1f6c6ad4be59cf2d56ee
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.