Bindinglaw

US · guidance

Justice Manual § 6-5.140

Affirmative Litigation—Ex Parte Order for Entry to Effect Levy

activein force · 2018-02-01 – presentas-observed

The IRS must obtain a warrant before entering constitutionally protected premises (including opening a bank safe deposit box) to seize property for the payment of taxes. The IRS will directly refer these cases to the United States Attorney’s Office.

IRS counsel will assist the United States Attorney’s Office in preparing the pleadings—which, depending on local practice, will include an ex parte application, affidavit or declaration from the IRS revenue officer, and proposed order—for the United States Attorney’s Office to review and submit to the United States District Court.

After receiving a referral from IRS counsel, the United States Attorney’s Office should expeditiously review the material to determine whether it meets the legal standard for obtaining an order for entry to effect levy, including making an independent determination that the taxpayer is, indeed, recalcitrant, and that the revenue officer has been unable to gain voluntary admittance to the property for purpose of seizure. The United States Attorney’s Office should assure that the revenue officer's affidavit or declaration is complete and accurate, and ascertain whether the case has any unusual features that may lead to denial of the writ.

History

[updated February 2018]

Provenance

Source
justice.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-20
Edition
jm-2026-09-20
Content hash
cf92d2bafe2a3672f6b716eed6ad9deac7296c65c3c120dcbb79f60c6687e881
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Justice Manual § 6-5.140 — Affirmative Litigation—Ex… · binding.law