Bindinglaw

US · guidance

Justice Manual § 1-6.340

Authorizing Disclosure in General

activein force · 2018-04-01 – presentas-observed

Section 16.23 of 28 C.F.R. provides that every attorney in the Department of Justice in charge of any case or matter in which the United States is a party is authorized, after consultation with the originating component, to disclose relevant unclassified material deemed necessary or desirable to the discharge of that attorney's official duties, provided the disclosure is appropriate under the rules of procedure and the law of privilege (28 C.F.R. § 16.26(a)), and further provided that disclosure would not violate statutes or regulations, or reveal confidential sources, classified information, trade secrets, ongoing investigations, or investigatory techniques. 28 C.F.R. § 16.26(b). For illustrative examples, see the DOJ Organization and Functions Manual at 23.

When, in the attorney's judgment, any of the factors set forth in Section 16.26(b) exists which preclude testimony or disclosure, no testimony or disclosure may be made without the express prior approval of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the division responsible for supervising the case or matter or such person's designee. 28 C.F.R. § 16.23(a). An attorney in charge of a case or matter in which the United States is a party may also, at any time, request that the supervisory Assistant Attorney General or the component’s Touhy Officer review his/her decision on complying with a demand. 28 C.F.R. § 16.23(b).

History

[updated April 2018]

Provenance

Source
justice.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-20
Edition
jm-2026-09-20
Content hash
24cac4f4857db133a561d69920261628aad27d4e019762abbe456abb22339da6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.