US · guidance
HOPE Guidance Manual v1.02, Item J0900
Pain Screening
Timepoint(s) Item Completed
Admission (ADM)
Item-Specific Instructions
• Assess the patient for the presence of pain.
• Item completion should be based on what is determined during the assessment visit and/or included in
the clinical record. Do not use sources external to the clinical record.
• Review the clinical record for information regarding pain screening.
• Consider results of the standardized pain screening tool and any other screening approaches the clinician
used that might include asking the patient about their pain comfort.
• Review all response choices before making a selection.
A. Was the patient screened for pain?
• Code 0, No, if the patient was not screened for pain, and/or there is no documentation that the patient
was screened for pain. Skip to Item J0905, Pain Active Problem.
• Code 1, Yes, if the patient was screened for pain and/or there is documentation that the patient was
screened for pain.
B. Date of first screening for pain
• Enter the date of the first screening for pain.
• It is possible that at the time of completion, multiple pain screenings will be documented in the clinical
record.
• Complete pain screening items based on the first pain screening documented in the clinical record.
C. The patient’s pain severity was: Use Table 4 below to assist with choosing pain severity.
Table 4: Pain Severity Ratings
Code When to Use Scale Equivalent Examples
(Numeric, verbal, visual, staff
observation, or other)
0, None if the patient’s pain severity score was
none.
0 on a 10-point numeric scale.
1, Mild if the patient’s pain severity score was
mild.
1–3 on a 10-point numeric scale.
2, Moderate if the patient’s pain severity score was
moderate.
4–6 on a 10-point numeric scale.
3, Severe if the patient’s pain severity score was
severe.
7–10 on a 10-point numeric scale.
9, Pain not rated if the patient had pain, but the patient’s
pain severity was not assessed or
documented.
D. Type of standardized pain tool used: Use Table 5 to determine the type of standardized pain tool used
for the assessment.
Table 5: Standardized Tools for Pain Assessment
Type of Tool When to Use Scale Type Examples
1, Numeric if a numeric scale was used to conduct
pain screening.
e.g., 10-point scale, the Edmonton
Symptom Assessment System
(ESAS), and Symptom Distress
Scale (McCorkle).
2, Verbal descriptor if a verbal descriptor scale was used to
conduct pain screening.
e.g., the Brief Pain Inventory,
McGill pain questionnaire
(MPQ), and the 6- Point Verbal
Pain Scale.
3, Patient visual if a patient visual scale was used to
conduct pain screening.
e.g., Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale,
visual analog scale, and a distress
thermometer.
4, Staff observation if a staff observational scale was used to
conduct pain screening.
Select only if a standardized staff
observational scale was used.
(e.g., Pain Assessment in Advanced
Dementia (PAIN-AD), the FLACC
scale, Critical Care Pain Observation
Tool (CPOT) or Checklist of
Nonverbal Pain Indicators (CNPI)).
Type of Tool When to Use Scale Type Examples
9, No standardized tool
used
if no standardized scale was used to
screen for the presence and severity of
pain.
Not Applicable.
Coding Tips
• Select the best response for pain severity based on the pain level at the time of the visit during which the
first screening was performed.
o If a range is provided, such as mild to moderate, report the highest level of severity experienced
during the visit.
• If a non-numeric scale was used to screen the patient for pain, select the pain severity item based on the
standard established for that scale.
o If no standard has been established for that scale, use clinician judgment to categorize severity.
History
HOPE Guidance Manual v1.02, effective October 1, 2025 (OMB control number 0938-1153).
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-17
- Edition
- hope-v1.02
- Content hash
a963d2f53aaf778744ad0faa1f87d1439f55b583fe241a7629501b8f560200d8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.