US · guidance
HOPE Guidance Manual v1.02, Item F3000
Spiritual/Existential Concerns
Timepoint(s) Item Completed
Admission (ADM)
Item-Specific Instructions
• Item completion should be based on what is included in the clinical record.
• Review the clinical record for information regarding discussion of patient preference regarding
spiritual/existential concerns.
• Consider care processes and discussions documented in the clinical record that took place during pre-admission or educational visits, as well as those during the admission assessment.
• Review all response choices before making a selection.
• Use the date on which the discussion first occurred.
A. Was the patient and/or caregiver asked about spiritual/existential concerns?
• Code 0, No, if there is no documentation that the hospice discussed (or attempted to discuss)
spiritual/existential concerns with the patient and/or caregiver(s). Skip to Item I0010, Principal
Diagnosis.
o This applies to situations where there is no documentation that a discussion occurred or was
attempted with the patient and/or caregiver (e.g., the patient was unable to discuss and/or the
caregiver was unavailable).
• Code 1, Yes, and discussion occurred, if there is documentation that the hospice discussed
spiritual/existential concerns with the patient and/or caregiver(s).
o This applies to situations where there is documentation that the hospice brought up the topic of
spiritual/existential concerns and engaged or had a conversation with the patient and caregiver. The
conversation does not have to result in the initiation of intervention(s) to address spiritual/existential
concerns.
• Code 2, Yes, but patient and/or caregiver refused to discuss, if there is documentation that
the hospice asked about spiritual/existential concerns, but the patient and/or caregiver(s) refused to
discuss or were unable to discuss. The hospice was not successful in engaging the patient and/or
caregiver in a discussion.
o This applies to situations where there is documentation that the hospice attempted to have a
conversation with the patient and caregiver, but both the patient and caregiver explicitly refused to
discuss the topic with the hospice (e.g., “I don’t want to talk about this” or “I’m only going to talk to
my priest about this”) or the patient was unable to discuss because of their clinical status and the
caregiver explicitly refused to discuss.
B. Date the patient and/or caregiver was first asked about spiritual/existential concerns.
• Enter the date the hospice discussed (or attempted to discuss) spiritual/existential concerns.
• Multiple discussions regarding spiritual/existential concerns may be documented in the clinical record.
• Completion of this item is based on the first dated discussion about spiritual/existential concerns that
appear in the clinical record.
Coding Tips
• For the purposes of completing this item, the “caregiver” does not have to be the legally authorized
representative.
• There is no comprehensive list of spiritual/existential concerns.
o Examples of a discussion regarding spiritual/existential concerns might include but are not limited to
asking the patient/caregiver about the need for spiritual or religious support, having a discussion
about a higher power related to illness, or offering a spiritual resource (such as a chaplain).
• Documentation in the clinical record indicating that a member of the hospice staff or IDG attempted to
discuss spiritual/existential concerns is sufficient to select either of the following for F3000A:
o “1, Yes, and discussion occurred.”
o “2, Yes, but the patient and/or caregiver refused to discuss.”
• Brief statements or data in the clinical record denoting a patient’s religious affiliation, or that denotes a
spiritual visit was offered without documentation of a discussion is not sufficient to code “Yes” for
F3000A.
• While these conversations are best held face-to-face, phone conversations with patients/families about
spiritual/existential issues can be used to answer yes to F3000 as long as the clinical documentation
supports that a discussion was had with the patient and/or caregiver.
• A discussion with the patient and/or caregiver(s) about spiritual/existential concerns can be initiated by
any member of the hospice staff or IDG.
Examples
1. Social worker assessment dated 08-01-2025 shows, “Patient’s spouse in a great deal of spiritual distress
and would like to speak with a chaplain. Referral made.”
Coding: F3000A: Was the patient and/or caregiver asked about spiritual/existential concerns? would be
coded 1, Yes, and discussion occurred. F3000B: Date the patient and/or caregiver was first asked about
spiritual/existential concerns. Enter “08-01-2025.”
Rationale: The completed assessment is strong evidence that the hospice engaged the patient and/or
caregiver in a discussion regarding spiritual/existential concerns. Even though the clinical record does
not contain documentation of a visit by the chaplain, code “1, Yes, and discussion occurred” because the
intent of F3000 is to capture the initiation of a discussion about spiritual/existential concerns.
2. Patient’s initial assessment shows, “patient identifies their religious affiliation as Baptist.”
Coding: F3000A: Was the patient and/or caregiver asked about spiritual/existential concerns? would be
coded “0, No” and skip to Item I0010, Principal Diagnosis.
Rationale: The intent of F3000 is to capture initiation of a discussion (or attempted discussion) about
spiritual/existential concerns. Clinical record documentation showing only the patient’s religious
affiliation is not sufficient evidence that the hospice had (or attempted to have) a discussion regarding
spiritual/existential concerns with the patient and/or caregiver.
History
HOPE Guidance Manual v1.02, effective October 1, 2025 (OMB control number 0938-1153).
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-17
- Edition
- hope-v1.02
- Content hash
45c00e1445184af4eef1362553a268d2eb7cb3cbf71ce54acf4705581872c4ef
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.