US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 5405.01 § 5
FSA APPROVED PROGRAMS
During initial and subsequent program reviews Unit Management team reviews completed
programs and provides program recommendations based upon remaining criminogenic needs and
recidivism risk score. Details of all approved programs are maintained in the FSA Approved
Programs Guide.
Existing programs are regularly reassessed for necessary changes and continued inclusion, and
newly submitted programs are reviewed monthly by a multidisciplinary FSA Program Review
Committee. The committee considers the evidence base for recidivism reduction, program
relevance, resource requirements, and existing gaps in programming when determining whether
to accept a new program for inclusion in the FSA Approved Programs Guide.
a. Recommendations. Department programming recommendations, progress, or concerns are
recorded in the Insight Feedback application for review during initial classification and inmate
program review meetings. If there is uncertainty about program recommendations in a specific
need area, consultation occurs between the Unit Management team, the inmate, and the relevant
department. This collaborative approach ensures the inmate’s criminogenic needs are addressed
and recommended programs are appropriate.
Program availability for inmates will vary by institution based on various factors such as
5405.01 5/7/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 5
institution population, staffing levels, and programming space. The program manager/facilitator
must weigh several factors when prioritizing EBRR program placement, including FSA
conditional placement dates, projected release dates, length of time on the wait list, and those
with high or medium risk of recidivism.
Inmates are only required to participate in one program that addresses one or more of their needs
at any given time with exception of a program that may be required under an alternative program
statement (e.g., GED or Drug Education.) Staff will not require an inmate to participate in a
second program, nor should they be marked as “decline,” if they are already actively engaged in
a program that meets one or more of their identified needs and cannot commit to another
program at that time. When reviewing wait rosters, staff must check each inmate’s current
programming to determine whether a conflict exists. Staff will consult with the inmate to decide
whether they want to continue with enrollment in the new program or remain on the waitlist until
they complete the program they are currently engaged in. If the inmate chooses to finish their
current program, they will be allowed to do so while staying on the waitlist for the other
program. The inmate should then be considered for the next available opportunity to participate
in the program for which they remained on the waitlist.
b. Registering. Inmates are responsible for contacting relevant departments to inform them of
their interest in participating in recommended programs. Departments will review requests and
follow program-specific criteria for registering inmates for desired programs. The department
responsible for the program must utilize the Insight Feedback application to provide a relevant
explanation as to why the inmate did not meet the specific program requirements at the time of
their request. The same department should suggest alternative programming to address
identified criminogenic needs.
c. Accommodations. Inmates with documented disabilities may require more time or
additional accommodations to complete an EBRR program or PA. The Program Statement
Management of Inmates with Disabilities provides guidance on developing local
accommodations. Ordinarily, an incomplete assignment is more appropriate than a program
failure assignment when cognitive or physical disabilities negatively impact the inmate’s ability
to complete a recommended EBRR program or PA. This determination should be made on a case-by-case basis, at the discretion of the program manager or facilitator and documented in the Insight
Feedback application.
d. Negative Outcomes. Declining to participate in recommended programming to address one
or more needs, or failure to successfully complete the program, may result in an inability to
obtain incentives outlined below and FTCs in accordance with the Program Statement First
Step Act of 2018 - Time Credits: Procedures for Implementation of 18 U.S.C. §
3632(d)(4).
5405.01 5/7/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 6
History
PS 5405.01 dated 2026-05-07
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
e52b7b2995f693b355e9bf651f1dbfa6c270b15b3b2987f874d614af022e4d58
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.