US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 5405.01 § 4
RISK AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (RNAS)
The RNAS evaluates and measures the recidivism risk and criminogenic needs of inmates
assisting staff in assigning programs geared toward reducing the likelihood of recidivism.
Additionally, the RNAS aligns evidence-based interventions with an inmate's specific needs,
learning style, motivation, and strengths.
The RNAS includes the Prisoner Assessment Tool Targeting Estimated Risk and Needs
(PATTERN) recidivism risk instrument and Standardized Prisoner Assessment for Reduction in
Criminality (SPARC) criminogenic needs assessments.
a. Recidivism Risk Assessment – PATTERN is the automated recidivism risk assessment
instrument that objectively assesses an inmate’s current level of risk for re-offending. This tool
calculates a recidivism risk score based upon predefined criteria outlined on the FSA pages of
the Bureau’s public and intranet sites. Several of the element scores show staff and inmates
programming opportunities to help decrease the inmate’s overall recidivism risk score, while
other factors, such as the offense of conviction and criminal history remain the same despite
program completions.
Participation in EBRRs and PAs is strongly encouraged and contributes to meaningful personal
5405.01 5/7/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 3
growth. Only designated program completions may reduce risk scores; these are identified in
the FSA Approved Programs Guide and listed on the FSA pages of the Bureau’s public and
intranet sites with additional scoring details.
Periodic Recidivism Risk Reassessment. Inmate risk scores are reassessed in
accordance with the Program Statement Unit Management and Inmate Program
Review. During regularly scheduled inmate program reviews, the Unit Management
team utilizes the Insight application to reassess the recidivism risk of each inmate. If the
review indicates a change in an inmate’s recidivism risk level, staff must review the
changes and recommend appropriate EBRR programs or PAs aligning with the updated
assessments. Ordinarily, changes are a result of the inmate’s age, completed programs,
and incident reports.
b. Criminogenic Needs Assessment – SPARC utilizes multiple needs assessment tools and
processes to evaluate specific criminogenic need areas that help focus program
recommendations to best prepare inmates to return to the community.
All needs are initially assessed upon arrival at the designated facility where the inmate begins
serving their sentence. This process includes assessments completed by staff and self-assessment
surveys completed by inmates. Needs are then reassessed throughout their sentence during
regularly scheduled inmate program reviews with Unit Management team.
Initial Criminogenic Needs Assessments. The applicable Bureau inmate management
system includes specific assignments for each identified need area. An explanation of
each assignment is listed on the FSA pages of the Bureau’s public and intranet sites. Most
time frames for completion are consistent with the initial program review as specified in
the Program Statement Unit Management and Inmate Program Review. Some
assessment time frames are extended past the initial program review and are determined
by discipline-specific program statements for general intake assessment requirements.
The FSA page of the Bureau’s intranet site includes the most up-to-date time frames for
each discipline.
Electronic Initial Self-Assessments. Inmates have one opportunity to complete the
electronic self-assessment surveys. If a session times out or remains incomplete, this will
result in a need refusal assignment in the applicable Bureau inmate management system.
Paper Initial Self-Assessments. Staff must provide inmates with paper-and-pencil self-assessments to complete and return if an electronic version is not available or a self-assessment need refusal requires remedy. Once the paper-and-pencil assessment is
finished, a staff member must score the assessment using the scoring instruments located
on the Bureau’s intranet pages and enter the result into the applicable Bureau inmate
management system. Additionally, assessments must be filed in section two of the
5405.01 5/7/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 4
Electronic Inmate Central File (e-ICF) application. The Warden will assign the
responsibility of scoring the self-assessments, entering the resulting need assignments,
and storing these documents as necessary.
The English and Spanish versions of the assessments and scoring tools can be found on the FSA
page of the Bureau’s intranet site.
Accommodations. Staff members may provide accommodations to inmates in
accordance with the Program Statement Management of Inmates with Disabilities.
Periodic Criminogenic Needs Reassessment. Inmate’s needs are reassessed in
accordance with the Program Statement Unit Management and Inmate Program
Review. During regularly scheduled inmate program reviews, the Unit Management team
utilizes the Insight application to reassess criminogenic needs of each inmate. If the
review indicates a change in an inmate’s recidivism risk level or any criminogenic needs,
staff must review the changes and recommend appropriate EBRR programs or PAs
aligning with the updated assessments. Ordinarily, changes are a result of completed
programs and incident reports. Specific criteria for satisfying criminogenic needs are
maintained on the Bureau’s intranet pages. Supplemental need reassessment methods
may also be incorporated into the overall process.
History
PS 5405.01 dated 2026-05-07
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
fbcf48f9d212ca14c9916dea203b3a8edb5aa9c25d28a2d9f3974997306b0c9f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.