US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 5380.06 § 1
[PURPOSE AND SCOPE § 505.1. This part establishes
procedures for the assessment and collection of a fee to cover
the cost of incarceration. The Director of the Bureau of Prisons
has been delegated the authority of the Attorney General (see 28
CFR 0.96c) to assess and collect a fee imposed by the Bureau in
the event the court neither imposes nor waives a fine pursuant to
the Sentencing Guidelines 5E1.2(d). For purposes of this part,
revocation of parole or supervised release is to be treated as a
separate period of incarceration for which a fee may be imposed.]
"This part" refers to the rules text (28 CFR § 505.1 through
505.9) contained in this Program Statement. In 1992, Congress
enacted Public Law 102-395, requiring the Bureau to establish
policy and procedures to collect fees for incarceration costs
(see 18 U.S.C. §4001, note). This policy applies to inmates who
are:
# convicted in U.S. District Courts,
# committed to Bureau custody, and
# serving a period of incarceration which began on or after
January 1, 1995.
Unless exempted, the Cost of Incarceration Fee (COIF) is a
financial obligation that sentenced inmates are required to
satisfy at the earliest possible time. Fees generated shall be
used to benefit the inmate population through program funding.
Collection of the COIF should be viewed within the larger context
of the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP).
History
PS 5380.06 dated 1999-08-11
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
865539301b932a958107f809fafe3a495ba641fa8d33b9981c9a91b9a483e468
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.