US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 5331.02 § 8
PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE § 3621(e) EARLY RELEASE ELIGIBILITY
The DAP staff (initial review) and DSCC legal staff (offense review) play key roles in
identifying and documenting an inmate’s eligibility for early release.
b. Drug Abuse Program Staff, Initial Review. If the Drug Abuse Program Coordinator
(DAPC) determines the inmate is qualified for participation in the RDAP, he or she will review
SENTRY to determine if the inmate:
• has received a prior early release under § 3621(e);
• is a contract boarder (e.g., a state or military inmate);
• is a pretrial offender;
• has a detainer that will prohibit completion of the community treatment component of the
RDAP;
• committed his/her federal offense before November 1, 1987; or
• committed his/her D.C. offense before August 5, 2000.
If the DAPC determines the inmate meets any of the above conditions, the inmate is NOT
ELIGIBLE for a § 3621(e) early release and no further review is required. The DAPC will then
meet with the inmate to notify him or her of his or her ineligibility for an early release. The
DAPC will also:
• have the inmate sign the Notice of RDAP Qualification form (BP-A0941).
• forward the Notice of RDAP Qualification form to the Unit Team for placement in the
inmate’s Central File; and
• enter the appropriate early release eligibility assignment into SENTRY.
Note: The DAPC can notify the inmate of his/her early release ineligibility and have the inmate
sign the Notice of RDAP Qualification form at the same time.
If the inmate is not excluded from eligibility upon the DAPC’s initial review, the inmate will
require a § 3621(e) offense review by the DSCC legal staff. The DAPC or designee will submit
(via GroupWise) a Request for § 3621(e) Offense Review form in a timely manner.
The DAPC or designee will also forward an electronic copy of the Judgment and Commitment
Order (J&C) and the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) if the DSCC does not already have
P5331.02 3/16/2009 Federal Regulations: bold type. Implementing instructions: regular type. Page 5
one. To determine whether the DSCC has a copy of an inmate’s J&C file (which includes the
PSR), the DAPC or designee will check the sentence computation data function in SENTRY. If
the “DSC” last updated the computation, the DSCC has a copy of the J&C file, and there is no
need to send a copy of the same with the Request for § 3621(e) Offense Review form. However,
if an institution last updated the computation, the DSCC does not have a copy of the J&C file. In
those cases, the DAPC or designee will send a scanned copy of the J&C file with the Request for
§ 3621(e) Offense Review form. The DAPC will place the inmate’s name and register number in
the subject line of the email to DSCC legal staff.
Designation and Sentence Computation Center, Offense Review. Upon receipt of the Request
for § 3621(e) Offense Review form and the J&C file, the DSCC legal staff will ordinarily have 30
working days to determine an inmate’s early release eligibility status based on a review of the
inmate’s current offense and prior convictions. The DSCC legal staff will review current and
prior offenses for both U.S. Code and D.C. Code felony offenders. For current U.S. Code
offenses, DSCC legal staff will refer to the Program Statement Categorization of Offenses to
determine whether an offense precludes early release under § 3621(e). For current D.C. Code
offenses, DSCC legal staff will refer to D.C. Code § 23-1331(4).
After completing the offense review, a legal staff member will complete and sign the
Request for § 3621(e) Offense Review form. Signature authority may not be delegated below the
attorney level.
Designated DSCC legal staff, upon completion of the review, will notify the DAPC of the result
of the review by forwarding the signed Request for § 3621(e) Offense Review form.
History
PS 5331.02 dated 2009-03-16
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
c4894c913f26ddf693bacdb94e50444a9125de3186f7eaafe3450d922268b34b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.