US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 5264.09 § 9
TELEPHONE RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY THE WARDEN
Inmates may be subject to telephone restrictions imposed by the Warden to protect the safety,
security, and good order of the institution, as well as to protect the public. Telephone restrictions
5264.09 9/3/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 10
imposed under the authority of this section are separate and apart from telephone restrictions
imposed by the Unit Discipline Committee (UDC) or Discipline Hearing Officer (DHO)
following formal and completed inmate discipline proceedings.
Inmates with telephone restrictions are still entitled to place at least one telephone call per
month, unless also under a sanction of telephone restriction the UDC or DHO imposed.
a. Authorized Circumstances. Inmates may be subject to telephone restrictions under this
section in the following two circumstances:
(1) Public Safety Factor (PSF). An inmate whose current offense, prior history, or threat
characteristics indicate a propensity to abuse telephone privileges will be assigned the
PSF - Serious Telephone Abuse. If an inmate is assigned the PSF for Serious Telephone Abuse, a
telephone restriction is authorized. See the Program Statement Inmate Security Designation
and Custody Classification for additional information regarding PSFs. Telephone restrictions
imposed under these circumstances are discretionary and necessary to ensure the institution’s
safety, security, good order and/or to protect the public. When deemed necessary, the inmate’s
Unit Manager will recommend this type of restriction to the Warden for final decision making.
Upon their initial commitment or redesignation, an inmate with a PSF for Serious Telephone
Abuse will not be authorized to use the ITS until classified by Unit Management. Inmates
identified at their initial classification as requiring telephone restrictions will not be permitted
access to the ITS until reviewed and approved by the Warden.
(2) Pending Investigation or Disciplinary Action for Possible Telephone Abuse. If an inmate
is pending an investigation or disciplinary action for possible telephone abuse, a partial or total
telephone restriction is authorized. Telephone restrictions imposed under these circumstances are
discretionary and necessary to ensure the institution’s safety, security, or good order, and protect
the public. When deemed necessary, the SIS office will ordinarily recommend this type of
restriction. Any telephone restriction recommended by the SIS office may only be imposed with
the Warden’s approval, in accordance with the procedures outlined in this section.
b. Procedures for Imposing or Removing Telephone Restrictions. The following procedures
must be followed when imposing, removing, or renewing, a telephone restriction under this
section:
(1) The appropriate staff member recommends a telephone restriction to the Warden by
completing the BP-A0740, Request for Telephone Restriction form. The staff member making
the recommendation should describe briefly the reason for the telephone restriction, as well as
the extent of the proposed restriction.
5264.09 9/3/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 11
For example, staff may recommend reducing an inmate’s telephone use to 100 minutes per
month rather than a total restriction, if such a restriction would sufficiently protect the safety,
security, or good order of the institution, and the public.
(2) The Warden will review the recommendation and either approve, modify, or deny the
restriction. If the Warden approves a restriction, such decision must be based on the conclusion
that it is necessary to protect the institution’s safety, security, or good order, and public.
(3) If the Warden approves a telephone restriction, a copy of the completed BP-A0740 is
provided to the inmate, the Trust Fund Office, and placed in Section 3 of the Inmate’s Central
File.
(4) Telephone restrictions imposed by the Warden due to a PSF for Serious Telephone Abuse
must be reviewed at least every six months, ordinarily in conjunction with the inmate’s program
review, to determine if the restriction should continue or be modified. A decision to continue the
current telephone restriction imposed under this section requires no further action but must be
documented on the BP-A0571, Program Review Report.
Any proposed change to a current telephone restriction must be made according to these
procedures and requires the Warden’s approval. If appropriate, an inmate’s telephone privileges
can be gradually restored, based on demonstrated responsibility documented by the inmate’s
assigned Unit Management or other staff.
(5) Telephone restrictions imposed pending an investigation or disciplinary action for possible
telephone abuse are limited to a period of 30 days. If an additional 30-day period is required to
complete either the investigation or disciplinary process, the Warden must re-authorize the
restriction using these procedures. Specifically, the Warden’s approval must be obtained on an
additional BP-A0740, Request for Telephone Restriction form. Unless re-authorized in this
manner, Trust Fund staff will obtain the Warden’s approval for reinstatement or continued
restrictions every 30 days.
Each subsequent restriction period is limited to 30 days. Staff should make every effort to
complete investigations and disciplinary proceedings for possible telephone abuse within the first
30-day period of the telephone restriction.
(6) Inmates with telephone restrictions under this section are still entitled to place at least one
telephone call per month, unless also under a sanction of telephone restriction the UDC or DHO
imposed following formal, and completed, inmate discipline proceedings. Ordinarily, such
telephone calls are placed through the ITS, not by staff.
(7) Inmates may challenge telephone restrictions imposed under this section utilizing the process
detailed in the Program Statement Administrative Remedy Program.
5264.09 9/3/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 12
REFERENCES
Program Statements
Inmate Legal Activities
Administrative Remedy Program
Trust Fund/Deposit Fund Manual
Inmate Security Designation and Custody Classification
Correspondence
Inmate Discipline Program
Religious Beliefs and Practices
Pretrial Inmates
Federal Regulations
28 CFR §§ 540.100–105
28 CFR § 541
28 CFR § 542
28 CFR § 551.151(a)–(b)
Bureau Forms Prescribed 5264.09
BP-A0740 Request for Inmate Telephone Restriction
Other Bureau Forms
BP-A0408 Acknowledgment of Inmate, Part 3 & 4
BP-A0571 Program Review Report
BP-A1054 TRULINCS Contact Request Form
ACA Standards
Performance-Based Standards and Expected Practices for Adult Correctional Facilities (5th
Edition): 5-ACI-7D-11, 5-ACI-7D-12, 5-ACI-7D-13, 5-ACI-4A-25, 5-ACI-4A-26, 5-ACI-4B-
25, 5-ACI-4B-26
Performance-Based Standards and Expected Practices for Adult Detention Facilities (5th
Edition): 5-ALDF-6A-02, 5-ALDF-6A-05, 5-ALDF-2E-23, 5-ALDF-2E-24, 5-ALDF-5B-11, 5-
ALDF-5B-12
Standards for the Administration of Correctional Agencies (2nd Edition): 2-CO-5D-01
Records Retention Requirements
Requirements and retention guidance for records and information applicable to this program are
available in the Records and Information Disposition Schedule (RIDS) on the Bureau’s intranet
site.
5264.09 9/3/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 13
History
PS 5264.09 dated 2026-09-03
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
3ea675372c62d58cadcc1b62f638ce221c1af805d0688c8c2aa42168f1ee3534
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.