US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 5251.06 § 12
SPECIAL AWARDS §545.29
a. Inmates who perform exceptional services not ordinarily a part of the inmate’s
regular assignment may be granted a special award regardless of the inmate's
work or program status. Examples of actions which may result in the inmate
being considered for a special award are the following:
(1) An act of heroism;
(2) Voluntary acceptance and satisfactory performance of an unusually
hazardous assignment;
(3) An act which protects the lives of employees or inmates, or the property of
the United States. (This does not apply to informants);
(4) Suggestions which result in substantial improvements or cost-savings in
institutional programs or operations; and
(5) Other exceptionally meritorious or outstanding services consistent with the
general character of the preceding cases.
b. The special award may be given in the form of a monetary payment in addition
to any other award (e.g., extra good time) given.
c. The Warden of each institution is empowered to approve special awards not
exceeding $150. Awards in excess of this amount may not be made unless
approved by the Regional Director.
The Monetary Special Award Recommendation form (BP-S576, available on Sallyport) and the
Extra Good Time Recommendation form (BP-S390, available on Sallyport) will be used
respectively when processing monetary special awards and extra good time.
History
PS 5251.06 dated 2008-10-01
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
a0319a602c3d239997867afe25d24f0a96dd66befb086e8cf87a6af9b23752bc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.