US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 5217.02 § 6
PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND REVIEWS
SMUs consist of three program levels, differentiated by the conditions of confinement and
expected time frames for completion, as described below. Completion of all levels is expected
within 9 to 13 months.
Level Expected Level Completion Time SMU Reviews
Initially within 28 days, no less than
One 6-8 Months
every90 days
fdfDays
Two 2-3 Months
No less than every 90 days
Three 1-2 Months
Inmates currently housed in the SMU as of August 9, 2016, or prior to the effective date of this
policy will be individually assessed using form BP-A0949, Special Management Review Report,
to determine their level in the SMU Program according to the provisions of this Program
Statement. The inmate’s ability to maintain clear conduct, successful participation in SMU
programming, and efforts at positive interaction with staff and other inmates will be considered
in making these assessments. For inmates currently housed in the SMU as of August 9, 2016, or
prior to the effective date of this policy, their time in the SMU may be more than 24 consecutive
months depending on their level in the SMU program.
a. Level One
Inmate Interaction. At this level, interaction between inmates is minimal (for example, shower,
recreation, programming). Inmates will normally be restricted to their assigned cells.
Admission and Orientation. Inmates will participate in an institution and unit admission and
orientation (A&O) program, as outlined in the Program Statement Admission and Orientation
Program. The goal of the SMU A&O program is to provide inmates with information regarding
institution operations, program availability, and the requirements for successful progression
through each of the three levels of the program. A&O may be conducted through in-cell
programming, using radio programs or other available technology.
P5217.02 8/09/2016 9
Programming. Initial programming assessment will occur within the first 28 days of an inmate’s
arrival at the SMU. Institution and SMU staff interact with each inmate on an individual basis to:
■ Assess the inmate’s program and counseling needs.
■ Discuss SMU program objectives/expectations.
■ Establish a set of program goals based on the inmate’s individual needs and the programming
available within the unit.
■ Communicate requirements of the SMU program, including the expectations the inmate must
meet before he/she will be considered for a general population institution.
Inmates will continue their involvement in GED or ESL, either individually or in a classroom
setting. Initially during this level, inmates may be involved in programs on a self-study basis.
Property. Inmates will have limited personal property, as determined by the Warden through the
Institution Supplement.
Level Progression. Progression through Level One is based upon the inmate’s compliance with
behavioral expectations, as established by institution and SMU staff. A multidiscipline Special
Management Review will be conducted by the Unit Manager, Captain, and Associate Warden
(chairperson)(or his/her acting). This review will include input from the SMU unit team,
correctional staff, psychology staff, education staff, and other appropriate staff to determine the
inmate’s readiness to progress to the next level. Review of the inmate will be documented on
form BP-A0949, Special Management Review Report, along with any accompanying
memoranda from any member referred to above, and will be filed in Section 2 of the inmate’s
Central File. After the initial programming assessment, Level One inmates will be reviewed at
least every 90 days.
Inmates are expected to progress to Level Two after 6-8 months.
a. Level Two
Inmate Interaction. At this level, interaction between inmates expands (for example, shower,
recreation, programming). Inmates will normally be restricted to their assigned cells, but out-of-
cell activities/programming may be increased on a case-by-case basis.
Programming. Inmates may continue their involvement in GED or ESL either individually or in
a classroom setting. Psychology staff will have frequent contact with inmates on the living unit
to promote the development of effective coping strategies and to assist inmates in adjusting to
P5217.02 8/09/2016 10
the institution environment. Psychology staff may provide in-cell materials that support the
program’s goals of responsible behavior and effective communication.
During this level, inmates may be involved in Evidence Based Therapy (EBT) groups. Individual
and/or small group counseling sessions dealing specifically with treatment readiness, fundamental
communication skills, criminal thinking, and improving coping/problem-solving skills may be
required. Staff monitor which inmates participate in group activities. All program activities
should reinforce the goal of acting responsibly. Curriculum at this level targets “treatment
readiness skills” (e.g., basic empathy, attending, responding, respect, genuineness), basic
cognitive skills, and criminal thinking. Small group counseling sessions may be conducted.
Property. At this level, inmates may have additional personal property, based on individual
performance as determined by the Institution Supplement.
Level Progression. Progression through this level is based upon the inmate demonstrating the
potential for positive “community” interaction. During Level Two, inmates generally program
and function separately. Progression to Level Three, however, requires that the inmate
demonstrate the ability to program with other individuals, groups, or gangs; the inmate’s
willingness/unwillingness to coexist with individuals, groups, or gangs must be documented via a
memorandum to the file. Accordingly, the multidiscipline Special Management Unit Review
prior to Level Three consideration must address CIM assignments in detail. This memorandum
may also be used as rationale in any subsequent CIM declassification request. Review of the
inmate will be documented on form BP-A0949, Special Management Review Report, along with
any accompanying memoranda from any member referred to above, and filed in Section 2 of the
inmate’s Central File. Level Two inmates are reviewed at least every 90 days. Inmates are
expected to progress to Level Three after two to three months. Inmates who fail to make
satisfactory progress may be returned to a previous level.
b. Level Three
Inmate Interaction. Inmates at this level will begin to interact in an open, but supervised,
setting with individuals from various groups, including open movement in the unit and frequent
group counseling sessions commensurate with the inmate’s demonstrated ability to effectively
coexist with other inmates. Staff monitor which inmates may be housed or participate in
activities together, as necessary to protect the safety, security, and good order of the institution.
There will also be increased privileges (e.g., increased commissary, property, etc.) at this level for
those who accomplish unit goals and maintain appropriate conduct.
P5217.02 8/09/2016 11
Programming. Activities at this level will intensify, with more interaction in a less restrictive
environment. Inmates continue to participate in counseling programs as outlined in Level Two.
Programming in this level will normally occur 3-5 hours Monday through Friday.
Psychology staff continue to have frequent contact with inmates on the living unit. In addition,
Psychology Services staff offer counseling groups that allow participants to learn and practice
effective skills. The focus and emphasis of SMU program counseling activities will be to
minimize the tendency of SMU inmates to involve themselves in disruptive behavior.
Counseling will focus on encouraging inmates to find ways in which they can program
appropriately with other inmates in a general population setting and behave responsibly.
Counseling will be evidence-based and involve cognitive-behavioral programming, , and
emphasize responsibility and accountability. First and foremost, the inmates must be taught to
look toward the future, as the decisions they are making affect their families and their ability to
prepare themselves for eventual reentry to society.
Property. At this level, inmate access to personal property may be incrementally increased from
Level Two based on individual performance. Inmates may be considered for the same personal
property privileges as general population inmates.
Level Progression. Progression through this level is based upon the inmate’s ability to
demonstrate positive “community” interaction skills. The inmate’s successful progression
through this phase will indicate he/she is prepared to function in a general population.
Normally, inmates who successfully complete the SMU program are redesignated to the general
population of another facility. In some situations, however, the SMU unit team may recommend
that the SMU graduate be assigned to the general population of that facility. In some cases,
inmates who successfully complete the SMU program may not be appropriate for general
population in another facility. Staff assess each case independently to ensure an appropriate
designation. Review of the inmate is documented on BP-A0949, Special Management Review
Report, along with any accompanying memoranda from any member referred to above, and filed
in Section 2 of the inmate’s Central File.
Inmates who fail to make appropriate levels of program participation may be returned to a
previous level.
History
PS 5217.02 dated 2016-08-09
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
e407dc16bfdb9b96bc9ea8761938a15e642ceb0df3c5116672d0ea81319fff91
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.