US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 5140.42 § 9
CASES ON APPEAL OR COLLATERAL ATTACK
OEO cannot approve a transfer if the inmate has a pending appeal or a collateral attack on his/her
conviction or sentence. The judgment must be final. The applicant should not apply for
transfer until the appeal process or collateral attack has concluded.
Note: An appeal challenges the decisions made in the same case. A collateral attack is a motion
filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which challenges some aspect of a former judgment due to an
allegation of injustice or unconstitutional treatment.
If an inmate advises his/her case manager that he/she has a pending appeal or collateral attack,
the case manager advises him/her that a transfer cannot be approved until a final judgment is
received. The status of the pending appeal or collateral attack is addressed during scheduled
program reviews. The inmate should be advised that he/she can notify staff of the Court’s
decision or any changes to the appeal or attack before program reviews. Once a final judgment
has been issued, staff submit the following to the Assistant Administrator, Correctional Programs
Branch:
P5140.42 4/10/2015 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 16
■ A memorandum indicating the inmate’s case is no longer on appeal or has a collateral attack
pending.
■ Documentation from the court showing the appeal or attack was dismissed, withdrawn,
resolved, etc.
■ An updated BP-A0297, Transfer Inquiry.
■ Application or reapplication packet.
History
PS 5140.42 dated 2015-08-06
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
53a8a1673fabda0a7d1842262f7cb60a6816ce07c3682053603b43999beeb130
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.