US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 5070.12 § 9
EVALUATIONS UNDER TITLE 18 § 3552(B)- PRE-SENTENCE. The
sentencing court may order a local community
psychologist/psychiatrist (LCPP) to complete the evaluation.
Evaluations can be conducted while the defendant is on bail by a
LCPP or in a local facility (Federal or non-Federal) by a LCPP -
Title 18 § 3552(b). If the sentencing judge finds that there is
a compelling reason for the Bureau to do the study or there are
no adequate professional resources available in the community to
perform the study the order may direct the Bureau to complete an
evaluation on a defendant who has been found guilty. The purpose
of this evaluation is to provide additional information that will
aid the court in imposing a final sentence. Ordinarily, the
court will specify what information it requires to assist in the
final determination of sentence.
The evaluator will inquire into those matters specified by the
court and any other information the Bureau evaluator believes is
important concerning Bureau policy and the application of
sentencing guidelines issued by the Sentencing Commission. Since
the determination of a sentence under the guidelines is the
province of the Court, recommendations ordinarily focus on
identifying psychological or psychiatric factors pertinent to the
sentencing guidelines to help the Court make its determination.
Examples of factors for consideration include, but are not
limited to:
# Diminished Capacity as defined by the Sentencing Commission
Guidelines.
# Mitigating and aggravating factors in the form of mental or
behavioral disorders.
# Unusual characteristics of the defendant.
# Additional information that may affect the application of
guidelines.
Recommendations provided in the evaluation shall not specifically
address or make recommendations as to numerical calculations or
recalculations of sentencing guideline elements.
P5070.12
4/16/2008
Page 4
The results of the evaluation are to be furnished to the
referring court within 60 days, unless the court grants an
extension for further study. An extension may not exceed an
additional 60 days.
a. Designation. Designations will be completed as outlined in
Chapter 3, Security Designation Procedures for New Commitments,
of Program Statement 5100.07, Security Designation and Custody
Classification Manual. Designation may be made to any Bureau
facility as long as this meets statutory requirements and the
facility has the resources necessary to meet the needs of the
inmate.
Following the designation, the Designation and Sentence
Computation Center (DSCC) shall forward to the institution all
available documents that may include, but are not limited to:
# Judgment in a Criminal Case (J&C), referral letter and
essential background information (e.g., copies of previous
evaluations), and Statement of Reasons (SOR).
# Pre-sentence/Post-sentence Report.
# Pretrial Services Report.
# Other relevant information provided in written form by
family, friends, or supervisors.
# Written communication to institution staff about the
specific objectives of the study.
# The arrest report or any other law enforcement agency
reports pertaining to the instant offense.
This information is essential in completing the background
sections of psychological and psychiatric evaluations, as well as
giving an indication of the defendant's behavioral pattern in the
community.
If the inmate does not arrive within 15 days of designation, the
receiving institution should contact the DSCC for assistance.
The Warden will designate a staff member, ordinarily the Case
Management Coordinator, to be responsible for initiating such
contact, as necessary. The psychologist or psychiatrist assigned
the evaluation will be responsible for requesting extensions (see
Attachment A for an extension letter example), and monitoring
progress and due dates of the evaluation.
b. Evaluation Cases With Referral Questions. The primary
report prepared by the forensic evaluator is the psychological or
psychiatric evaluation (see the Forensic Evaluation Training
Manual for an example). Psychological evaluations will be
prepared by a licensed psychologist and psychiatric evaluations
P5070.12
4/16/2008
Page 5
should be prepared by a licensed psychiatrist. Clinical interns
may be involved in the process, but their work will be closely
supervised by a licensed psychologist or licensed psychiatrist.
Other assessments that may be part of an evaluation include an
educational, medical, vocational, or other assessment prepared by
the appropriate discipline. The need for, and content of, such
assessments will depend on the objectives of the evaluation and
the nature of the court's questions. The psychologist or
psychiatrist responsible for completing the evaluation shall
summarize the consultants’ findings in the evaluation, or include
written consultations in their entirety. If written
consultations are included, the consultant(s) shall also sign the
evaluation, specifying which sections they authored.
c. Pre-Sentence Evaluation With No Referral Questions. When the
court has no specific referral questions for the evaluation, and
efforts to secure referral questions have been unsuccessful, the
Bureau will provide the court an evaluation that includes any
information the evaluator believes is pertinent to the factors
set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). This may include:
# A description of the nature of the offense.
# Characteristics of the defendant.
# Risk of dangerousness and propensity of defendant to engage
in further criminal conduct.
# Needed education, vocational training, medical care, or
other treatment.
History
PS 5070.12 dated 2008-04-16
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
bd07438b4c25d90338a71b7e1e13fa78efe388dce7333d1371be0b2b8c21ddf5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.