US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 3792.11 § 6
SUPERVISORY REFERRALS.
Employees may be referred to the EAP by their supervisors based upon concerns about work
performance, conduct, and/or attendance, or general concerns for personal well-being. When a
supervisor notes such concerns, the supervisor may recommend to the employee that he/she meet
with an EAP Counselor to receive information on EAP services.
Information obtained during counseling sessions will not be released to the supervisor, except as
authorized by the staff member through a signed BP-A0907, EAP Consent for Release of
Confidential Information-Redisclosure Prohibition form.
Supervisors may offer informal referral recommendations to employees at their discretion.
These recommendations are not documented. Ordinarily, informal referrals are suggested as an
early intervention or offered out of concern for an employee’s well-being.
Formal Supervisory Referrals require the following operational procedures:
■ Prior to making a Formal Supervisory Referral, the supervisor will discuss the case with a
Bureau EAP Counselor. During this supervisory consultation, the EAP Counselor will
P3792.11 4/4/2023 8
determine whether the employee is an appropriate referral and advise the supervisor of this
finding.
■ The supervisor will issue a written referral, recommending the employee seek EAP
consultation. Ordinarily, the recommendation is also verbally communicated to the employee
by the supervisor in a manner designed to reduce potential employee distress. This meeting
recognizes the likelihood a Formal Supervisory Referral will be perceived as a disciplinary
measure or adversarial in nature. The EAP Counselor will review the letter prior to issuance.
The referral will:
(1) Document the reason for referral (e.g., work performance, conduct, attendance, and/or
personal difficulties);
(2) Specify neither the documentation nor the referral to EAP constitutes a disciplinary
action;
(3) State the supervisor has consulted with the EAP Counselor;
(4) Indicate the supervisor’s work expectation;
(5) Indicate participating in EAP is voluntary, but recommended, and is confidential.
(6) The original letter will be given to the employee, with a copy to the EAP Coordinator.
This letter must not be placed in the employee’s official personnel folder.
■ In the event a supervisor initiates a discipline, performance, or conduct based action, the
supervisor should concurrently remind employees they may access EAP services regardless
of their duty status. A referral for assistance shall not affect the processing of a disciplinary
action.
■ Supervisors must not diagnose or label an employee’s problem. In exercising their
responsibilities, supervisors must focus on job performance and/or conduct and communicate
in a manner to foster engagement. However, these administrative tasks should not be
prioritized over the needs of the employee as a person (e.g., providing support,
acknowledging struggles, communicating in a way to foster engagement).
■ Supervisors will protect the privacy of their employees by using appropriate discretion and
professionalism regarding EAP services.
■ Consistent with the Program Statement Standards of Employee Conduct, if a supervisor is
aware an employee has engaged in a code of conduct violation, the supervisor will first report
the known facts to management (their immediate supervisor, the CEO, the Office of Internal
Affairs, or to the Office of the Inspector General at the Department of Justice).
History
PS 3792.11 dated 2023-04-04
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
ed211e4d0b649475e5addd6f402544c56a71c1c24f4ca59af9ddd8970997b506
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.