US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 3712.01 § 4
DISPUTE RESOLUTION SPECIALISTS (DRS)
A DRS program must be implemented at every Bureau facility, to include the Central Office,
Regional Offices, Grand Prairie, and Staff Training Centers. The CEO determines the number of
DRSs needed for their facility or facilities.
The DRS is a collateral duty staff member who is available to resolve workplace disputes upon
being contacted by another staff member. No staff should be compelled to use the services of the
DRS. The program is entirely voluntary and initiated by the staff member. The DRS will have 15
calendar days from the date of contact to attempt to assist in resolving the dispute, unless an
extension is granted by the staff member who contacted the DRS.
a. DRS Selection. The DRS position is not advertised. The CEO must select one or more
individuals based on the following criteria:
■ Neutrality. It is important for the DRS to be perceived by staff as neutral.
■ Credibility. The DRS should be viewed by staff as credible; perceived by staff to be fair,
objective, and thorough; and someone staff feel comfortable approaching to discuss their
concerns.
■ Accessibility. The DRS should be easily available for all staff to contact.
■ Confidentiality. For staff to feel comfortable discussing their issues and concerns with
the DRS, they must be someone who can maintain confidentiality.
■ Good People Skills/Good Communication Skills. The DRS must be someone with
good people and communication skills and be a good listener.
■ Good Problem-Solving Skills. The DRS should possess good problem-solving skills.
They should have the ability to discuss creative solutions with both parties involved in
the issue. Any experience in problem solving is beneficial.
3712.01 3/19/2026 PROPERTY OF US GOVERNMENT 5
b. DRS Training. Prior to assuming the duties of the DRS, the newly selected staff member
must complete the required Dispute Resolution Specialist – BOP training on the online Bureau
Learning University (BLU).
c. Removal of a DRS. At any time and for any reason not otherwise prohibited by law, the
CEO may remove a staff member from their collateral DRS responsibilities.
d. Who can utilize the services of the DRS. Any staff member may utilize the services of the
DRS. The dispute can involve a co-worker, a supervisor, or a subordinate. If the DRS has
knowledge a conflict is being investigated by the Office of Internal Affairs (OIA), they must not
provide counseling regarding this matter. See the Program Statement Office of Internal Affairs.
e. Procedures utilized by the DRS. Prior to having any discussions with staff seeking
assistance, the DRS will provide them with a copy of the Dispute Resolution Process.
If the staff member wants the DRS to attempt to seek resolution of their issue, the DRS will use
conflict resolution skills to meet with all the parties involved. There will be no formal
documentation of any agreements reached.
f. DRS Reports. For confidentiality purposes, the DRS does not maintain any documentation
regarding the individuals seeking their assistance. Twice a year (October 1st, for the period of
April 1 - September 30; and April 1st, for the period of October 1 - March 31), they must submit
a report to their respective CEO, and the CRAA listing the information on the BP-A1177,
Dispute Resolution Specialist Reporting form. The CRAA will submit regional reports to each
Regional Director.
History
PS 3712.01 dated 2026-03-19
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
7f424fa5ab5ae5d3b4b831188295c636aef2d950ab0aff6504a350ece8b6dd06
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.