US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 2272.06 Change Notice 1
Change Notice 1
U.S. Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Change DIRECTIVE AFFECTED: 2272.06
CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER: 2272.06
Notice
DATE: 6/11/98
1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE. To revise the Program Statement on
Temporary Duty Assignments (Emergency Situations) to integrate
changes negotiated with the Council of Prison Locals, American
Federation of Government Employees.
2. SUMMARY OF CHANGES. Highlights of changes include:
# Changes were made in language regarding the employee’s right
to request early departure from the TDY assignment, as well
as the employer’s obligation to consider any adverse effect
the TDY assignment may have on the employee or his or her
family.
# Staff will be given 100 percent of estimated expenses, less
common carrier costs. Staff may request a Government-issued
American Express card if their TDY assignment is known at
least 30 days in advance.
# Language was added strengthening provisions that direct the
Bureau to provide transportation for TDY employees to and
from the TDY work site and for other necessary purposes
outlined in the Federal Travel Regulations.
# The Council of Prison Locals President retains the right to
designate the Union representative for the TDY site.
3. ACTION. File this Change Notice in front of the Program
Statement on Temporary Duty Assignments (Emergency Situations).
/s/
Kathleen Hawk Sawyer
Director
History
Change Notice 1 dated 1998-06-11
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
15adb650e668c9cdcdce472f8ef5a4f4536bb0b2b3cae32aea4028db7e0890c8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.